Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glycan-encoded immune checkpoints and allorecognition: a mechanistic framework for transplantation and organ engineering.

Frontiers in transplantation·2026
Same author

The Structure-Activity Relationship and Anticoagulation Mechanism of Polyglycerol Sulfates of Different Architectures.

Biomacromolecules·2026
Same author

Generation of enzyme-converted type O whole blood from type A whole blood: A translational study using swine whole blood.

Transfusion·2025
Same author

Platelet Polyphosphate Signals Through NFκB to Induce Myofibroblast Differentiation.

Biomolecules·2025
Same author

Enzyme-converted O kidneys allow ABO-incompatible transplantation without hyperacute rejection in a human decedent model.

Nature biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

A-BioHPG: A Hydrophilic Biodegradable and Hemocompatible Hyperbranched/Dendritic Polyketal Polyglycerol with Tunable Degradation.

Biomacromolecules·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.3K

Engineering biomaterials surfaces to modulate the host response.

Kai Yu1, Yan Mei1, Narges Hadjesfandiari1

  • 1Centre for Blood Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada; Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces
|September 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Surface engineering using polymer brushes can improve biomaterial biocompatibility. These modifications create non-fouling surfaces and can incorporate bioactive agents to modulate host responses for better medical device performance.

Keywords:
Antimicrobial surfacesBiomaterials-surface engineeringBlood coagulationComplement activationNon-fouling surfacesPolymer brushes

More Related Videos

Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes
06:39

Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes

Published on: June 8, 2022

1.6K
Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
09:46

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials

Published on: July 8, 2021

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.3K
Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes
06:39

Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes

Published on: June 8, 2022

1.6K
Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
09:46

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials

Published on: July 8, 2021

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surface Chemistry
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Blood-contacting biomaterials can trigger adverse host responses like thrombosis, complement activation, and inflammation.
  • The interaction between biomaterial surfaces and blood components critically influences the host's biological reaction.
  • Surface engineering offers a method to enhance biomaterial biocompatibility and precisely control biological responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review polymer brush-based surface modification strategies for biomaterials.
  • To explore both passive (non-fouling) and active (bioactive agent conjugation) approaches.
  • To highlight methods for creating biocompatible and antibacterial biomaterial surfaces.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing polymer brushes with varied structures and chemistries to create non-fouling surfaces.
  • Conjugating bioactive agents such as peptides, carbohydrates, and proteins onto polymer brushes.
  • Reviewing existing literature on polymer brush applications in biomaterial surface modification.

Main Results:

  • Polymer brushes can be designed to passively prevent undesirable biological interactions.
  • Bioactive agents conjugated to polymer brushes enable active modulation of host responses.
  • Surface modification with polymer brushes can yield biocompatible and antibacterial material properties.

Conclusions:

  • Polymer brush technology is a versatile tool for tailoring biomaterial surface properties.
  • Both passive non-fouling and active bioactive strategies are effective in improving biocompatibility.
  • Further exploration of polymer brush applications holds significant promise for advanced medical devices.