Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

07:13
Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
4.4K
Implementation of a shared medication list: physicians' views on availability, accuracy and confidentiality
Tora Hammar1, Anders Ekedahl, Göran Petersson
1eHealth Institute, Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden, tora.hammar@lnu.se.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
|September 7, 2014
Summary
Regionally shared medication lists improve prescription information availability and accuracy but may risk patient confidentiality. Early IT security and patient involvement are key for successful implementation.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Medical Record Systems
- Patient Data Management
Background:
- Accurate and secure patient drug prescription information is crucial for healthcare.
- Swedish counties have increasingly adopted regionally shared medication lists.
- Challenges exist in balancing information accessibility with data privacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate physicians' perspectives on changes in accuracy, availability, and confidentiality.
- To assess the impact of transitioning from local to regional medication lists.
- To identify key factors for successful shared medication list implementation.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with physicians (n=7).
- Focus on physicians' experiences after transitioning to a regionally shared medication list.
- Analysis of views on information accuracy, availability, and confidentiality.
Main Results:
- Shared lists significantly improved information availability, consolidating data in one accessible location.
- Perceived potential for increased accuracy, though completeness varied with non-current drug entries.
- Increased risk to patient privacy necessitates enhanced IT security and data protection measures.
Conclusions:
- Physicians view regional medication lists as enhancing prescription information accessibility and potentially accuracy.
- Confidentiality remains a concern, requiring robust security protocols.
- Recommendations include clear responsibilities, early IT security consideration, and patient involvement.

