Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Large-vessel giant cell arteritis: a cohort study
Francesco Muratore1, Tanaz A Kermani1, Cynthia S Crowson2
1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Insights
Patients with large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA) of the extremities were younger and had more relapses than those with cranial GCA (C-GCA). LV-GCA patients required higher corticosteroid doses and longer treatment, indicating limitations in current GCA classification criteria.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Vascular Medicine
- Immunology
Background:
- Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis.
- GCA predominantly affects the aorta and its branches.
- Distinguishing large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA) from cranial GCA (C-GCA) is crucial for management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare baseline characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes in patients with LV-GCA (primarily upper extremities) versus C-GCA.
- To evaluate the efficacy of existing classification criteria for LV-GCA.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective comparison of patients diagnosed with LV-GCA (subclavian involvement) and C-GCA between 1999 and 2008.
- Inclusion criteria: age >50 years, radiographic evidence for LV-GCA, biopsy-proven C-GCA.
- Data collected included demographics, symptoms, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, treatment, and outcomes.
Main Results:
- The study included 120 LV-GCA and 212 C-GCA patients.
- LV-GCA patients were younger (68.2 vs 75.7 years), had longer symptom duration, and more polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
- LV-GCA patients experienced higher relapse rates (4.9 vs 3.0/10 person-years), required higher cumulative corticosteroid (CS) doses (11.4g vs 9.1g at 1 year), and longer treatment duration (4.5 vs 2.2 years).
Conclusions:
- Despite a lower rate of vision loss, LV-GCA is associated with increased relapses and higher corticosteroid requirements compared to C-GCA.
- The current ACR classification criteria are insufficient for accurately classifying patients with LV-GCA.
- Further research is needed to refine diagnostic and classification criteria for LV-GCA.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare baseline variables, treatment and outcomes in patients with large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA), primarily of the upper extremities, with those with cranial disease (C-GCA).
Methods:
All patients >50 years of age with radiographic evidence of subclavian LV-GCA diagnosed between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2008 were identified and compared with those with biopsy-positive C-GCA diagnosed in the same period.
Results:
The study included 120 LV-GCA patients and 212 C-GCA patients. Compared with C-GCA, patients with LV-GCA were younger [68.2 years (s.d. 7.5) vs 75.7 (7.4), P < 0.001] and had longer duration of symptoms at GCA diagnosis (median 3.5 vs 2.2 months, P < 0.001). A history of PMR was more common in LV-GCA patients (26% vs 15%, P = 0.012), but a smaller proportion had cranial symptoms (41% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and vision loss (4% vs 11%, P = 0.035). ACR classification criteria for GCA were satisfied in 39% of LV-GCA patients and 95% of C-GCA patients (P < 0.001). Compared with C-GCA, patients with LV-GCA had more relapses (4.9 vs 3.0/10 person-years, P < 0.001), higher cumulative corticosteroid (CS) doses at 1 year [11.4 g (s.d. 5.9) vs 9.1 (s.d. 3.7), P < 0.001] and required longer treatment (median 4.5 vs 2.2 years, P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Although patients with LV-GCA had a lower rate of vision loss, they had a higher relapse rate and greater CS requirements. The ACR criteria for GCA are inadequate for the classification of patients with LV-GCA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

