Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

06:32
Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
Published on: December 5, 2025
902
Maxillary sinus augmentation by crestal access: a retrospective study on cavity size and outcome correlation
Sergio Spinato1, Fabio Bernardello2, Pablo Galindo-Moreno3
1Unit of Periodontology and Implantology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Clinical Oral Implants Research
|September 9, 2014
Summary
Crestal sinus elevation with limited bone height (<5 mm) is more predictable in narrow maxillary sinuses. This technique shows better intra-sinus bone coverage in narrow sinuses compared to wide ones.
Area of Science:
- Oral Surgery and Implantology
- Radiology and Imaging
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Crestal sinus elevation is a common procedure to augment bone height for dental implants.
- Mineralized human bone allograft is utilized for sinus augmentation.
- Maxillary sinus size can influence the outcomes of sinus elevation procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and radiographic outcomes of crestal sinus elevation.
- To correlate these outcomes with maxillary sinus size.
- To evaluate the predictability of the crestal technique in sinuses with initial bone height ≤5 mm.
Main Methods:
- Sixty sinus augmentations were performed in 60 patients with initial bone height ≤5 mm.
- Digital radiographs and CBCT were used for evaluation from surgical placement up to 72 months post-loading.
- Marginal bone loss (MBL), intra-sinus bone loss (IBL), sinus size, and implant distances were analyzed using ANOVA and linear regression.
Main Results:
- Marginal bone loss (MBL) increased over time and was correlated with 6-month MBL.
- Intra-sinus bone loss (IBL) correlated significantly with sinus wall distance and time.
- Greater IBL was observed in wide sinuses (≥13.27 mm) compared to narrow sinuses (<13.27 mm).
Conclusions:
- The crestal sinus elevation technique with <5 mm residual ridge height is more appropriate and predictable in narrow maxillary sinuses.
- This predictability is specifically related to achieving better intra-sinus bone coverage.
- The study provides the first quantitative, statistically significant evidence supporting this conclusion.
Keywords:
crestal sinus augmentationintra-sinus bone lossmarginal bone lossmaxillary sinus sizeradiographic and CBCT evaluation
