Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces01:13

Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces

2.7K
In animal cells, the extracellular matrix allows cells within tissues to withstand external stresses and transmits signals from the outside of the cell to the inside. The extracellular matrix is extensive, and its composition varies between different types of tissues. For example, the reticular fibers and ground substance make up the ECM in loose connective tissue, while collagen and bone minerals make up the ECM of bone tissue. 
Anchoring junctions mechanically attach a cell to the...
2.7K
Tension Response at Adherens Junctions01:26

Tension Response at Adherens Junctions

3.1K
The adherens junctions that anchor cells together are multi-protein complexes that dynamically adapt to mechanical stimuli such as tensile forces and shear stress. Mechanosensory proteins in these junctions can sense such mechanical stimuli and undergo a shift in their conformation, resulting in an altered function — a process called mechanotransduction.
α-Catenin as a Mechanosensory Protein
The α-catenin of adherens junctions is an allosteric protein with three VH (vinculin...
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MMP9 drives cancer invasion by mediating integrin membrane trafficking and stabilization.

The FEBS journal·2026
Same author

RAC1 signaling in polyploid giant cancer cells: Implications for tumorigenesis and therapy resistance.

Cancer letters·2026
Same author

Predicting statistics of gene translocation events: Role of chromatin compaction and double-strand DNA break.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Differences in cellular mechanics and ECM dynamics shape differential development of wing and haltere in Drosophila.

Developmental biology·2026
Same author

Glucose deprivation induces AMPK-dependent α-actinin-4 expression to sustain energy efficient non-proteolytic migration.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same author

Compaction of chromatin domains regulates target search times of proteins.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Using Cell-substrate Impedance and Live Cell Imaging to Measure Real-time Changes in Cellular Adhesion and De-adhesion Induced by Matrix Modification
09:11

Using Cell-substrate Impedance and Live Cell Imaging to Measure Real-time Changes in Cellular Adhesion and De-adhesion Induced by Matrix Modification

Published on: February 19, 2015

9.6K

Probing cellular mechanoadaptation using cell-substrate de-adhesion dynamics: experiments and model.

Soumya S S1, Lakshmi Kavitha Sthanam2, Ranjith Padinhateeri2

  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Plos One
|September 9, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cellular stiffness adapts to substrate stiffness. Faster cell de-adhesion on stiffer substrates is due to force-dependent bond breakage, revealing interplay between substrate properties and cell-matrix adhesions.

More Related Videos

Single Cell Durotaxis Assay for Assessing Mechanical Control of Cellular Movement and Related Signaling Events
08:30

Single Cell Durotaxis Assay for Assessing Mechanical Control of Cellular Movement and Related Signaling Events

Published on: August 27, 2019

7.5K
A Simplified System for Evaluating Cell Mechanosensing and Durotaxis In Vitro
09:50

A Simplified System for Evaluating Cell Mechanosensing and Durotaxis In Vitro

Published on: August 27, 2015

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Using Cell-substrate Impedance and Live Cell Imaging to Measure Real-time Changes in Cellular Adhesion and De-adhesion Induced by Matrix Modification
09:11

Using Cell-substrate Impedance and Live Cell Imaging to Measure Real-time Changes in Cellular Adhesion and De-adhesion Induced by Matrix Modification

Published on: February 19, 2015

9.6K
Single Cell Durotaxis Assay for Assessing Mechanical Control of Cellular Movement and Related Signaling Events
08:30

Single Cell Durotaxis Assay for Assessing Mechanical Control of Cellular Movement and Related Signaling Events

Published on: August 27, 2019

7.5K
A Simplified System for Evaluating Cell Mechanosensing and Durotaxis In Vitro
09:50

A Simplified System for Evaluating Cell Mechanosensing and Durotaxis In Vitro

Published on: August 27, 2015

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Cell Biology
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Extracellular matrix (ECM) physical properties regulate cellular processes.
  • Cells exhibit stiffness matching to substrates, adapting their cortical stiffness.
  • Trypsin de-adhesion assays probe cellular contractile mechanics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate substrate property influence on cell de-adhesion dynamics.
  • Combine experimental and computational approaches.
  • Understand mechanoadaptation and cell-matrix adhesion mechanics.

Main Methods:

  • Culturing NIH 3T3 fibroblasts on collagen-coated polyacrylamide hydrogels of varying stiffness.
  • Performing trypsin de-adhesion experiments.
  • Developing and utilizing a computational model to analyze de-adhesion timescales.

Main Results:

  • Fibroblasts de-adhered faster on stiffer substrates.
  • Computational model demonstrated substrate stiffness and bond breakage rate influence de-adhesion.
  • Faster de-adhesion on stiffer substrates is attributed to force-dependent cell-matrix adhesion breakage.

Conclusions:

  • Trypsin de-adhesion is a useful biophysical tool for studying mechanoadaptation.
  • Substrate properties and bond breakage rate collectively determine de-adhesion timescales.
  • Mechanisms of cell-matrix adhesion force-dependent breakage are highlighted.