Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

3.0K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
3.0K
Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality01:23

Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality

2.6K
Carl Rogers, a key figure in humanistic psychology, believed that individuals possess an innate potential for growth and fulfillment. According to his model of personality, three significant components define an individual: the organism, the self, and conditions of worth.
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
2.6K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

749
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
749
Defining Psychology01:24

Defining Psychology

5.8K
Psychology is the scientific discipline dedicated to understanding both observable behavior and the internal mental processes underlying such behavior. It aims to comprehend human nature and apply this understanding to solve practical problems, enhance well-being, and improve societal outcomes. An example of psychology's application is the study of prosocial behavior, such as why and under what conditions individuals might help strangers in need. This process involves describing observed...
5.8K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

3.7K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
3.7K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

57.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robert "Bob" Henley Woody (1936-2024).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

Robert "Bob" Henley Woody (1936-2024).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

The concept of awe and the construct of transpersonal self-expansiveness: Commentary on Katz and Franz (2026).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

Detecting Inconsistencies and Fraud in Research Data: Time for Authors to Share the Data Underlying Their Summary Statistics as a Matter of Course.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor regarding Kamal WM, Maged AM, Salah N, El-Goly NA, El-Sherbiny W, Hassan ES. Impact of ultraviolet radiation on bone density and muscle strength in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol Sci . 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.5468/ogs.25077.

Obstetrics & gynecology science·2025
Same author

James "Jim" C. Coyne (1947-2024).

The American psychologist·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

5.8K

Positive psychology and romantic scientism.

Nicholas J L Brown, Alan D Sokal1, Harris L Friedman2

  • 1New York University.

The American Psychologist
|September 9, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This response addresses critiques of a prior article that identified mathematical flaws in the critical positivity ratio. The authors highlight the importance of scientific self-correction, even when identifying issues within positive psychology.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.3K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

5.8K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.3K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Positive Psychology
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • A previous article on the critical positivity ratio (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005) received over 350 citations.
  • Despite its popularity, the article contained mathematical deficiencies that were not widely recognized.
  • This response addresses comments from various researchers on a critique of the original article.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reply to scholarly comments regarding a critique of the critical positivity ratio.
  • To discuss the reasons why mathematical deficiencies in the original article remained unrecognized for an extended period.
  • To underscore the self-correcting nature of scientific inquiry.

Main Methods:

  • The study is a scholarly reply to peer comments.
  • It involves a critical analysis of mathematical underpinnings in psychological research.
  • Discussion of the scientific process and potential barriers to critical evaluation.

Main Results:

  • The authors reiterate the mathematical flaws identified in the critical positivity ratio.
  • They explore potential reasons for the delayed recognition of these flaws, including optimism about peer review and reluctance to challenge established ideas.
  • The response reaffirms the importance of rigorous mathematical scrutiny in psychological research.

Conclusions:

  • The critique of the critical positivity ratio demonstrates science as a self-correcting process.
  • The authors express a preference for issues to be identified and resolved earlier in the scientific process.
  • This exchange highlights the need for enhanced critical thinking and mathematical literacy within positive psychology.