Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
Published on: March 27, 2019
A study comparing the effectiveness of three warning labels on the package of driving-impairing medicines
Bas Emich1, Liset van Dijk, Susana P Monteiro
1University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, emich.bas@gmail.com.
Background:
Several medicines are known to potentially impair patients' driving fitness. Appropriate communication towards patients about this risk can be supported by the use of package warning labels.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of a standing practice yellow/black label-with written warning-with a newly developed rating model in communicating risk on driving-impairing medicines (DIMs). Furthermore, the added value of a side-text in the rating model was determined.
Setting:
Community pharmacies in the Netherlands.
Method:
In a cross-sectional study, patients with a first dispensing of a DIM were asked by their community pharmacists (n = 38) to fill out a written questionnaire to compare each of the three warning labels. A 2 [yellow/black label vs. rating model (pair 1) and rating model with side-text vs. rating model without side-text (pair 2)] × 3 [category of driving-impairment: I = minor risk, II = moderate risk, III = severe risk] design was used. The category of driving-impairment varied per respondent, depending on the DIM the patient collected.
Main Outcome Measure:
(1) estimated level of driving risk valued by patients (2) intention to change driving behaviour after seeing the warning label.
Results:
An estimated number of 992 patients were approached. As 298 questionnaires were analysed, the net response rate was 30%. With the yellow/black label, respondents considered DIMs of all three categories of driving-impairment to equally impair driving fitness, while with the rating model the estimated risk was higher when the category referred to a higher level of driving-impairment. Addition of a side-text to the rating model resulted in a significantly higher estimated level of driving risk and a significant increase in intention to change driving behaviour. Only 8.0% of the patients using a category III DIM estimated the level of driving risk correctly when seeing the yellow/black label, while this was 26.7% for the rating model and 43.0% for the rating model with side-text.
Conclusion:
The yellow/black label, which is standing practice in the Netherlands, is less effective in terms of estimated risk and intention to change driving behaviour, compared to a newly developed rating model. This model is even more effective when a side-text is added. Implementation of the rating model in clinical practice should be considered.
More Related Videos
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Drug Regulation
Depressants
Alcohol is a common depressant that can induce a sense of relaxation and reduced inhibition at low doses. Contrary to its occasional...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients