Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
Published on: August 11, 2023
Botulinum toxin injection for hypercontractile or spastic esophageal motility disorders: may high-resolution
S Marjoux1, C Brochard2, S Roman1,3,4
1Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, E. Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Insights
Botulinum toxin injections offer relief for esophageal motility disorders, but the Chicago classification may not predict treatment success. Specific achalasia types showed poor response, indicating a need for further research.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
- Endoscopic Therapeutics
Background:
- Endoscopic botulinum toxin injections are used for achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders.
- High-resolution manometry (HRM) with Chicago classification aids diagnosis.
- Predicting treatment response to botulinum toxin remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if manometric diagnosis via Chicago classification in HRM predicts clinical response to botulinum toxin injections.
- To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin for spastic and hypertensive esophageal motility disorders.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 45 patients treated with botulinum toxin for esophageal motility disorders.
- Systematic reanalysis of high-resolution manometry (HRM) recordings.
- Patient phone surveys to assess long-term efficacy and satisfaction.
Main Results:
- 71% of patients showed significant improvement at 2 months; 57% remained satisfied for over 6 months.
- No clear difference in response based on manometric diagnosis.
- Achalasia type 3 with normal integrated relaxation pressure showed no response to botulinum toxin.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic botulinum toxin injections can be effective for some spastic or hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders.
- The Chicago classification diagnosis does not reliably predict treatment outcomes.
- Further prospective randomized trials are needed to identify optimal candidates for esophageal botulinum toxin therapy.
Abstract:
Endoscopic injections of botulinum toxin in the cardia or distal esophagus have been advocated to treat achalasia and spastic esophageal motility disorders. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether manometric diagnosis using the Chicago classification in high-resolution manometry (HRM) would be predictive of the clinical response. Charts of patients with spastic and hypertensive motility disorders diagnosed with HRM and treated with botulinum toxin were retrospectively reviewed at two centers. HRM recordings were systematically reanalyzed, and a patient's phone survey was conducted. Forty-five patients treated between 2008 and 2013 were included. Most patients had achalasia type 3 (22 cases). Other diagnoses were jackhammer esophagus (8 cases), distal esophageal spasm (7 cases), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (5 cases), nutcracker esophagus (1 case), and 2 unclassified cases. Botulinum toxin injections were performed into the cardia only in 9 cases, into the wall of the distal esophagus in 19 cases, and in both locations (cardia and distal esophagus) in 17 cases. No complication occurred in 31 cases. Chest pain was noticed for less than 7 days in 13 cases. One death related to mediastinitis occurred 3 weeks after botulinum toxin injection. Efficacy was assessed in 42 patients: 71% were significantly improved 2 months after botulinum toxin, and 57% remained satisfied for more than 6 months. No clear difference was observed in terms of response according to manometric diagnosis; however, type 3 achalasia previously dilated and with normal integrated relaxation pressure (4s-integrated relaxation pressure < 15 mmHg) had the worst outcome: none of these patients responded to the endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin. Endoscopic injections of botulinum toxin may be effective in some patients with spastic or hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders. The manometric Chicago classification diagnosis does not seem to predict the results. Prospective randomized trials are required to identify patients most likely to benefit from esophageal botulinum toxin treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Esophageal Achalasia
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...

