Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Blue code: Is it a real emergency?
Serkan E Eroglu1, Ozge Onur1, Oğuz Urgan1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Research and Training Hospital, 34890, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Misuse of hospital rapid response teams ("blue codes") is common, often triggered by staff concerns rather than actual emergencies. Further research is needed to optimize their effective implementation and reduce inappropriate activations.
Area of Science:
- Medical quality improvement
- Hospital patient safety
Background:
- Rapid response teams (RRTs), or "blue codes," are crucial for preventing in-hospital deaths.
- While RRT education is widespread in Turkey, actual "blue code" activations are infrequent and often misused.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence and reasons behind inappropriate "blue code" activations in a hospital setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 89 "blue code" activations over five months.
- Physician classification of activations as true or wrong codes based on predefined criteria.
- Data analysis using frequencies and Chi-square tests.
Main Results:
- Staff concern for the patient was the most frequent reason for "blue code" activation (22 cases).
- Other reasons included change in mental status (18) and conversion disorder (18).
- Physicians initiated 76% of the activations.
Conclusions:
- Significant misuse of "blue code" activations was observed.
- More research is required to determine the optimal implementation and effectiveness of RRTs.
Background:
Cardiac arrests in hospital areas are common, and hospitals have rapid response teams or "blue code teams" to reduce preventable in-hospital deaths. Education about the rapid response team has been provided in all hospitals in Turkey, but true "blue code" activation is rare, and it is abused by medical personnel in practice. This study aimed to determine the cases of wrong blue codes and reasons of misuse.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed the blue code reports issued by our hospital between January 1 and June 1 2012. A total of 89 "blue code" activations were recorded in 5 months. A "blue code" was defined as any patient with an unexpected cardiac or respiratory arrest requiring resuscitation and activation of a hospital alert. Adherence to this definition, each physician classified their collected activation forms as either a true or a wrong code. Then, patient data entered a database (Microsoft Excel 2007 software) which was pooled for analysis. The data were analyzed by using frequencies and the Chi-square test on SPSSv16.0.
Results:
The patients were diagnosed with cardiopulmonary arrest (8), change in mental status (18), presyncope (11), chest pain (12), conversive disorder (18), and worry of the staff for the patient (22). Code activation was done by physicians in 76% of the patients; the most common reason for blue code was concern of staff for the patient.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study show that more research is needed to establish the overall effectiveness and optimal implementation of blue code teams.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Bystander Effect
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult

