Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction

Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction

DefinitionTraumatic brain injury, or TBI, is a disturbance of normal brain function induced by an external mechanical force, such as a direct blow to the head or a penetrating injury. It can affect both brain structure and function, producing a wide range of clinical outcomes. TBI is a heterogeneous condition, meaning its effects may differ based on the type, location, and severity of the injury.Basis of ClassificationTBI is classified based on severity, injury mechanism, or pathophysiology. In...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Novel Psychiatric Disorders Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Second Year of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

Journal of neurotrauma·2026

Same author

MEG Working Memory N-Back Task Revealed Functional Deficits in Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Journal of neurotrauma·2026

Same author

A longitudinal study of inter-hemispheric transfer time across the corpus callosum in adults following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): Evidence from event-related potentials (ERP) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

Neuropsychologia·2026

Same author

Characterizing Heterogeneity in Brain Morphology in Traumatic Brain Injury Using Normative Modeling.

Neurology·2026

Same author

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychiatric Disorders in Year 1 of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.

The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026

Same author

A corpus callosum visual ratings system is associated with cognition and visual ratings of white matter and medial temporal atrophy in dementia.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2026

Same journal

Immediate vs delayed concussion reporting: role of concussion knowledge, attitudes, and symptoms.

Brain injury·2026

Same journal

Patient outcomes post self-inflicted traumatic brain injury during the acute phase.

Brain injury·2026

Same journal

Memory alterations over a football season are dependent on athlete position-type and prior concussion history.

Brain injury·2026

Same journal

Managing concussions in New Zealand secondary schools: Let's take it seriously.

Brain injury·2026

Same journal

Stacking machine learning model for risk stratification of acute respiratory distress syndrome after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter retrospective study.

Brain injury·2026

Same journal

Low-intensity focused ultrasound for a child with chronic disorders of consciousness: a promising case report.

Brain injury·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

A Metric Test for Assessing Spatial Working Memory in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

A Metric Test for Assessing Spatial Working Memory in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 7, 2021

Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.

Erin D Bigler¹

¹Department of Psychology .

|September 13, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Symptom validity testing (SVT) helps determine valid neuropsychological findings after brain injury. Borderline SVT results present interpretation challenges, requiring further research and potentially advanced neuroimaging.

Keywords:

Effort testing neuropsychological assessment performance validity testing symptom validity testing traumatic brain injury

More Related Videos

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

A Metric Test for Assessing Spatial Working Memory in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

A Metric Test for Assessing Spatial Working Memory in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 7, 2021

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

Neuropsychology
Neuroscience
Clinical Psychology

Background:

Valid neuropsychological test findings are crucial for understanding neurocognitive effects of brain injury.
Symptom validity testing (SVT) is a key method for assessing the credibility of neuropsychological test results.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the existing research on symptom validity testing (SVT).
To highlight interpretative challenges associated with SVT performance, particularly in the intermediate or border-zone range.
To explore the potential benefits of performance validity testing (PVT) over SVT and the role of neurobiology of effort.

Main Methods:

Comprehensive review of research on symptom validity testing (SVT).
Analysis of established cut-scores for passing and failing SVT.
Examination of case studies to illustrate interpretative difficulties.
Review of historical perspectives and the neurobiology of effort.

Main Results:

Passing SVT scores generally indicate valid neuropsychological performance.
Scores significantly below chance strongly suggest invalid performance and potential malingering.
Intermediate or border-zone SVT scores present substantial interpretative challenges.

Conclusions:

Rigid interpretation of established SVT cut-scores can be problematic.
Advances in neuroimaging may aid in understanding border-zone SVT failures.
Further research is needed to understand how neurological, neuropsychiatric, and testing conditions influence SVT performance.