Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

06:00
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
Published on: October 1, 2011
16.1K
Diet shift induced rapid evolution of size and function in a predatory bird
Risto Tornberg1, Laura Liuska, Seppo Rytkönen
1Department of Biology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland, risto.tornberg@oulu.fi.
Oecologia
|September 14, 2014
Summary
Northern goshawk body size and sternum shape have changed over decades, reflecting a diet shift towards smaller prey. These adaptations suggest directional selection, potentially influenced by global warming.
Area of Science:
- Avian biology
- Evolutionary morphology
- Ecology
Background:
- Predator body size typically correlates with prey size.
- Dietary shifts necessitate adaptations in hunting strategies and traits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate long-term trends in northern goshawk sternum size and shape.
- To correlate these changes with shifts in prey availability and hunting modes.
Main Methods:
- Geometric morphometrics applied to museum specimens of northern goshawks (1962-2008).
- Analysis of sternum size and shape in relation to sex, prey type, and cause of death (starvation vs. accidental).
Main Results:
- Goshawk body size decreased in both sexes, reflecting a shift from tetraonids to smaller avian prey.
- Sternum shape evolved towards a "Buteo-type" in both sexes, correlating with smaller prey and potentially indicating selection for agility.
- A "Buteo-type" sternum was more prevalent in "fit" individuals (accidental death) than starved individuals, suggesting selective advantage.
Conclusions:
- Observed morphological changes in goshawks are likely driven by directional selection due to dietary shifts towards smaller, more agile prey.
- Global warming may also contribute to body size decrease, making the scenarios inseparable.
- Museum collections are valuable for studying long-term phenotypic changes in large raptors.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
37.4K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.4K
Speciation Rates
18.8K
Overview
18.8K
Optimal Foraging
11.7K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.7K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.9K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K
The Evidence for Evolution
39.3K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
39.3K

