Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
Published on: April 17, 2020
Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion
Christopher M Burkle1, Richard R Sharp2, Eelco F Wijdicks2
1From the Department of Anesthesiology (C.M.B.), the Biomedical Ethics Program, Departments of Health Sciences Research and General Internal Medicine (R.R.S.), and the Department of Neurology (E.F.W.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. burkle.christopher@mayo.edu.
Abstract:
Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defining test-the apnea test. This core principle in neurology has been challenged recently in court and resulted in an unprecedented continuation of care in a 13-year-old child declared dead. This review comments on the medical, legal, and ethical quandaries introduced by this case and highlights the major elements of consensus on matters related to brain death that have been forged over 3 decades of sustained medical and societal debate. A clear appreciation by physicians and the public of the diagnostic determination of death following loss of brain function will help to prevent similar conflicts from occurring in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Necrosis
Morphological Manifestations of Necrosis
Necrotic cells show different types of morphological appearance depending on the type of tissue and infection. In coagulative necrosis, cells become...
Brain Waves
Dementia l: Introduction
Cellular Injury IV: Necrosis
Brain Abscess l: Introduction

