Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Differentiating left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes from that in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Stefano Caselli1, Martin S Maron2, Josè A Urbano-Moral2
1Institute of Sports Medicine and Science, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) from athlete's heart in athletes with borderline left ventricular (LV) wall thickness is crucial. Left ventricular cavity size, specifically <54 mm, is the most reliable echocardiographic marker for distinguishing HC from athlete's heart.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Sports Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) from athlete's heart is challenging in young athletes with borderline left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (13-15 mm).
- Accurate differentiation is vital for appropriate clinical management and to prevent misdiagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of simple echocardiographic and clinical variables for differentiating HC from athlete's heart.
- To identify reliable criteria for distinguishing these conditions in the "gray zone" of LV hypertrophy.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 28 athletes without cardiovascular disease and 25 untrained patients with HC, matched for LV wall thickness, age, and gender.
- Analysis of clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters including LV cavity dimensions, aortic root, left atrium size, and e' velocity via tissue Doppler imaging.
Main Results:
- Athletes exhibited larger LV cavities (60±3 vs 45±5 mm), aortic roots (34±3 vs 30±3 mm), and left atria (42±4 vs 33±5 mm) compared to HC patients.
- An LV cavity size <54 mm demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for differentiating HC from athlete's heart.
- Higher e' velocity in athletes (12.5±1.9 vs 9.3±2.3 cm/s) and absence of diffuse T-wave inversion on ECG were also significant differentiating factors.
Conclusions:
- Left ventricular cavity size (<54 mm) is the most reliable echocardiographic criterion for differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart in cases of borderline LV hypertrophy.
- Additional factors like left atrial size, diastolic function (e' velocity), electrocardiographic findings (T-wave inversion), and family history aid in the differential diagnosis.
Abstract:
Identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) in young athletes is challenging when left ventricular (LV) wall thickness is between 13 and 15 mm. The aim of this study was to revise the ability of simple echocardiographic and clinical variables for the differential diagnosis of HC versus athlete's heart. Twenty-eight athletes free of cardiovascular disease were compared with 25 untrained patients with HC, matched for LV wall thickness (13 to 15 mm), age, and gender. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables were compared. Athletes had larger LV cavities (60 ± 3 vs 45 ± 5 mm, p <0.001), aortic roots (34 ± 3 vs 30 ± 3 mm, p <0.001), and left atria (42 ± 4 vs 33 ± 5 mm, p <0.001) than patients with HC. LV cavity <54 mm distinguished HC from athlete's heart with the highest sensitivity and specificity (both 100%, p <0.001). Left atrium >40 mm excluded HC with sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 71% (p <0.001). Athletes showed higher e' velocity by tissue Doppler imaging than patients with HC (12.5 ± 1.9 vs 9.3 ± 2.3 cm/second, p <0.001), with values <11.5 cm/second yielding sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 61% for the diagnosis of HC (p <0.001). Absence of diffuse T-wave inversion on electrocardiography (specificity 92%) and negative family history for HC (specificity 100%) also proved useful for excluding HC. In conclusion, in athletes with LV hypertrophy in the "gray zone" with HC, LV cavity size appears the most reliable criterion to help in diagnosis, with a cut-off value of <54 mm useful for differentiation from athlete's heart. Other criteria, including LV diastolic dysfunction, absence of T-wave inversion on electrocardiography, and negative family history, further aid in the differential diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

