Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.

G O Einstein1, M A McDaniel, S Lackey

  • 1Department of Psychology, Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina 29613.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of simultaneous interference upon free recall learning and retention.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

What is minimal about predictive inferences?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Many-to-one and one-to-many associative learning in a naturalistic task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2001
Same author

Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature.

The Journal of applied psychology·2001
Same author

Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2001
Same author

The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman's (1988) model and the general aptitude test battery.

The Journal of applied psychology·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Bizarre images are less susceptible to interference from common memory cues than common images. This suggests unique properties of bizarre stimuli enhance memory recall, especially when competing information is encountered.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Studies
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Previous research indicates similar recall for bizarre and common images in unmixed lists.
  • The susceptibility of memory to interference is a key factor in recall accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if bizarre images are less vulnerable to interference from common encoding materials compared to common images.
  • To explore the mechanisms underlying memory recall for bizarre versus common stimuli under interference conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Participants studied lists of either bizarre or common sentences.
  • An interfering task involving common sentences, common nouns, or common pictures was administered.
  • Free recall of the initial sentence list was assessed after the interference task.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Bizarre images showed better recall than common images following interference with common sentences or pictures.
  • Common images showed better recall of components than bizarre images after interference with bizarre sentences.
  • Interference tasks using common concrete nouns did not differentially impact memory for bizarre or common images.

Conclusions:

  • Bizarre images demonstrate greater resistance to interference from certain common encodings, suggesting distinct memory processing.
  • Superior recall of bizarre images is linked to enhanced image access, while common images benefit from constituent recovery.
  • The unique characteristics of bizarre stimuli play a crucial role in their memory performance and resistance to interference.