Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

First Impression01:09

First Impression

422
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
422
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

717
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
717

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Sequential effects in visual search, action control, and task switching: Evidence for distinct episodic-retrieval mechanisms.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Higher Trophic Status Leads to More Diverse and Divergent Microeukaryote Communities Over Time in Urban Lakes From the Greater Paris (France).

Environmental microbiology reports·2026
Same author

Visual distraction and experience-based suppression in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A registered report.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026
Same author

Temporal dynamics of integration and individuation: Insights from temporal averaging and crowding.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K

Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.

Liana Amunts1, Amit Yashar1, Dominique Lamy1

  • 1The School of Psychology Sciences and The Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.

Frontiers in Psychology
|September 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Intertrial priming in visual search does not enhance attentional priority. This effect, observed in asymmetric search tasks, occurs only when the more salient target repeats and is consciously perceived.

Keywords:
attentional priority allocationinter-trial primingpreattentive processingpriming of pop-outsearch asymmetryserial searchvisual search

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

8.8K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

8.8K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual search efficiency improves with consistent target features across trials.
  • Intertrial priming, where target repetition speeds search, is typically studied in efficient singleton searches.
  • Previous research has not fully explored intertrial priming in less efficient, non-pop-out visual search tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if intertrial priming increases attentional priority during serial visual search.
  • To examine whether target repetition affects search efficiency in less efficient search paradigms.
  • To determine the conditions under which intertrial priming occurs and its impact on attention.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two visual search tasks known for relatively inefficient performance: searching for an angry face among neutral faces (and vice versa) and searching for a 'Q' among 'O's (and vice versa).
  • Participants performed serial search tasks where target and distractor roles could unpredictably exchange.
  • Measured search efficiency and analyzed the occurrence and asymmetry of intertrial priming.

Main Results:

  • Substantial intertrial priming was observed in both experiments, but it did not improve search efficiency.
  • Intertrial priming was asymmetric, occurring only when the more salient target repeated.
  • The findings suggest priming does not modulate attentional priority in these specific search conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Intertrial priming does not appear to modulate attentional priority allocation during visual search.
  • Asymmetric intertrial priming in these tasks is linked to consciously perceived features of the more salient target.
  • The study highlights the complex relationship between priming, attention, and feature salience in visual search.