Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Simultaneous variable selection for joint models of longitudinal and survival outcomes
Zangdong He1, Wanzhu Tu1,2, Sijian Wang3
1Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.A.
This study introduces a new penalized likelihood method for variable selection in joint longitudinal and survival models. The method, using adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (ALASSO) penalties, effectively selects fixed and random effects, addressing model misspecification.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Research Methodology
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Joint models for longitudinal and survival data are increasingly vital in clinical studies.
- Accurate specification of fixed and random effects is crucial for reliable data analysis.
- Simultaneous variable selection guards against joint model misspecification, yet remains understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present a novel penalized likelihood method for simultaneous variable selection in joint models.
- To provide practitioners with a computational tool for selecting fixed and random effects in complex longitudinal and survival data.
- To address the lack of existing methods for variable selection in joint longitudinal-survival models.
Main Methods:
- A penalized likelihood approach employing adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (ALASSO) penalties for simultaneous fixed and random effects selection.
- Reparameterization of random effects variance components using Cholesky decomposition to introduce group shrinkage penalties.
- A two-stage selection procedure to mitigate estimation bias introduced by penalization, with bias amelioration in the second stage.
- Approximation of penalized likelihood using Gaussian quadrature and optimization via an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm.
Main Results:
- Simulation studies demonstrated excellent variable selection performance in the initial stage.
- The proposed method achieved small estimation biases in the second stage of the selection procedure.
- The methodology was successfully illustrated using a real-world dataset analyzing a longitudinal clinical marker and patient survival in heart failure.
Conclusions:
- The developed penalized likelihood method with ALASSO offers an effective solution for simultaneous variable selection in joint longitudinal and survival models.
- The two-stage procedure successfully balances selection accuracy and estimation bias.
- This approach provides a valuable computational tool for analyzing complex clinical data with both longitudinal and survival components.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...

