Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Normal mandibular growth and diagnosis of micrognathia at prenatal MRI
Ursula Nemec1, Stefan F Nemec, Peter C Brugger
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Objective:
The aim of this article is to present reference data for fetal mandibular growth on magnetic resonance imaging, enabling the diagnosis of micrognathia.
Methods:
Retrospectively, on 355 magnetic resonance scans of apparently facially normal fetuses [gestational age (GA), 20-36 weeks], mandibular anterior-posterior diameter (APD = mandibular size), inferior facial angle (IFA = mandibular position), and jaw index (APD normalized to biparietal diameter) were correlated with GA by Pearson correlation. APD-age relationship was modeled. A receding chin was subjectively determined. Ten fetuses with mandibular anomalies were compared with normal fetuses.
Results:
For GA, APD showed high correlation (r = 0.850; P < 0.001), IFA (r = 0.086; P = 0.119) no correlation, and jaw index (r = -0.139; P = 0.018) weak correlation. APD-age relationship was expressed by the following: APD = 0.281 + 0.989 * GA (r(2) = 0.723). A receding chin was identified in 7/10 abnormal fetuses. APD, IFA, and jaw index of abnormal and normal fetuses were significantly different (P < 0.001). In 10/10 abnormal fetuses, IFA was <50.0°; in 7/10, jaw index was less than the fifth percentile (micrognathia); in 3/10, jaw index was at low normal range (retrognathia).
Conclusions:
Subjective identification of micrognathia may be limited. Reference data provide quantitative evaluation of mandibular size and position. An IFA <50° reflects micrognathia or retrognathia; a jaw index less than the fifth percentile suggests micrognathia.
