Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Methane emission by Nellore cattle subjected to different nutritional plans
Olinta Leone Cota1, Darcilene Maria de Figueiredo, Renata Helena Branco
1Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri-UFVJM, campus JK, Alto do Jacuba, Rodovia MGT 367, KM587, 5000, Diamantina, MG, Brazil.
Nellore cattle in feedlots consumed more nutrients and had higher dry matter digestibility. While daily methane emissions were greater, feedlot diets resulted in lower energy loss from methane production compared to grazing.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Nutritional Physiology
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from cattle represent a significant source of greenhouse gases.
- Nutritional strategies can influence methane production and nutrient utilization in livestock.
- Understanding the impact of different feeding systems on Nellore cattle is crucial for sustainable agriculture.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate enteric methane emissions in Nellore cattle under distinct nutritional plans.
- To assess nutrient intake and digestibility in cattle subjected to feedlot and grazing systems.
- To compare energy losses associated with methane production between feeding systems.
Main Methods:
- Forty-seven Nellore cattle were evaluated in a feedlot (corn silage-based diet) followed by a grazing period (Urochloa brizantha).
- Chromic oxide was used as an external marker for fecal production estimation.
- The SF6 tracer gas technique quantified methane emissions; nutrient intake and digestibility were analyzed chemically.
Main Results:
- Feedlot-fed cattle exhibited higher total dry matter and organic matter intake and greater dry matter digestibility.
- Organic matter digestibility was lower in the feedlot treatment.
- Daily methane emission (g/day) was higher in feedlot cattle, but energy loss as methane (CH4/CEB) and methane per dry matter consumed were lower compared to grazing.
Conclusions:
- The higher quality diet in the feedlot system led to increased nutrient intake and dry matter digestibility.
- Despite higher daily methane output, feedlot diets were more energetically efficient, resulting in lower relative energy losses via methane.
- Nutritional management, specifically feedlot diets, can mitigate energy loss associated with enteric methane production in Nellore cattle.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
06:52Lab-Scale Model to Evaluate Odor and Gas Concentrations Emitted by Deep Bedded Pack Manure
Published on: July 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Production Efficiency
Overview of Metabolism
Plant Metabolism
Sunlight, the primary source of energy in plants, is first absorbed by the chlorophyll pigments present in their leaves. Plants then use this energy to carry out photosynthesis, where water is oxidized into oxygen and carbon dioxide...
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Overview of Nitrogen Metabolism
The largest pool of nitrogen available in the terrestrial ecosystem is gaseous nitrogen (N2) from the air, but this...