Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aiko Nagayama1, Tetsu Hayashida2, Hiromitsu Jinno1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (AN, TH, HJ, MT, TS, AM, TM, KO, YK); Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK (HA, TA).

Abstract

Insights

Combining two anti-HER2 agents with chemotherapy offers the best neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, maximizing pathological complete response (pCR) rates.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Increasing number of anti-HER2 agents necessitates optimal neoadjuvant therapy selection for HER2-positive breast cancer.
  • Assessing efficacy and safety of various neoadjuvant regimens is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapies for HER2-positive breast cancer.
  • To identify the optimal treatment strategy for maximizing pathological complete response (pCR).

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
  • Inclusion of 10 studies with 2247 patients across seven treatment arms.
  • Bayesian statistical model to pool direct and indirect evidence on pCR, treatment completion, and safety.

Main Results:

  • Dual anti-HER2 agent regimens showed significantly higher pCR compared to single anti-HER2 agent regimens (e.g., CT + trastuzumab + pertuzumab vs. CT + trastuzumab, OR = 2.29).
  • Lapatinib-containing regimens were associated with reduced treatment completion due to adverse events.
  • Chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab demonstrated the highest probability of achieving pCR.

Conclusions:

  • Combining two anti-HER2 agents with chemotherapy is the most effective neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer.
  • This combination strategy optimizes pathological complete response rates.

Related Concept Videos