Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making
Robin L Aupperle1, Andrew J Melrose, Alex Francisco
1Department of Psychiatry, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, California; Psychiatry Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Department of Psychology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to reveal brain activity during approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Findings show prefrontal-striatal-insula circuitry activation predicts approach versus avoidance behaviors.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision Science
Background:
- Approach-avoidance conflict paradigms are crucial for understanding anxiety and fear.
- While frontal-striatal-amygdala circuitry is implicated in approach-avoidance learning, the neural basis of decision-making in this context remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify neural substrates underlying decision-making in approach-avoidance conflict using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
- To investigate how brain activity relates to approach versus avoidance behaviors and individual differences.
Main Methods:
- A human approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) paradigm was employed with 15 healthy adults during fMRI scanning.
- Analyses compared conflict to non-conflict conditions and examined reward level effects on brain activation.
- Trial-by-trial amplitude modulation analyses identified brain areas involved in decision-making during approach/avoidance behavior.
Main Results:
- Conflict trials showed greater activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, caudate, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to non-conflict trials.
- Activation in the right caudate and lateral PFC was modulated by reward level.
- Higher caudate and lateral PFC activation correlated with less approach behavior, indicating individual differences.
Conclusions:
- The prefrontal-striatal-insula circuitry plays a key role in determining approach versus avoidance decisions.
- The AAC paradigm is a valuable tool for studying anxiety-related processing and decision-making differences.
Related Concept Videos
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

