Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.

W R Glaser1, M O Glaser

  • 1Psychological Institute, University of Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|March 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Picture naming.

Cognition·1992
Same author

The time course of picture-word interference.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1984
Same author

Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1982
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

This study explored Stroop-like effects using pure stimuli, finding preserved inhibition. Unexpectedly, a semantic gradient appeared only in naming, not reading, suggesting distinct processing pathways for words and images.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • The Stroop effect typically involves interference between color words and ink colors.
  • Previous research primarily used modally mixed stimuli (e.g., color-word).
  • The processing of different modalities (color, picture, word) and their interaction is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Stroop-like effects using modally pure stimuli (color-color, picture-picture, word-word).
  • To examine how stimulus modality affects semantic interference in naming, reading, and categorization tasks.
  • To propose and test a cognitive model explaining modality-specific processing.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted 6 experiments using modally pure color-color, picture-picture, and word-word stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed naming, reading, and categorization tasks to assess response times and interference.
  • Analyzed the presence and characteristics of Stroop inhibition across different tasks and stimuli.
  • Main Results:

    • Stroop-like inhibition was consistently observed with modally pure stimuli.
    • A semantic gradient in interference was found exclusively in the naming task, not the reading task.
    • Word categorization was slower and more prone to interference than picture categorization.

    Conclusions:

    • Semantic memory and the lexicon are likely separate cognitive systems.
    • Words may have privileged access to the lexicon, while pictures and colors access the semantic network preferentially.
    • This model accounts for modality-specific processing differences observed in Stroop-like tasks.