Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

4.6K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.6K
Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

4.0K
Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Apical Electrode Placement to Augment Intracochlear Current in Patients With an Ossified Cochlea and Incomplete Electrode Array Insertion.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

Remote Monitoring of Bioelectrical Impedance in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: 1-Year Pilot Longitudinal Study.

JMIR biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Validation of CURB-65, CRB-65, NEWS2, qSOFA, and 4C scores for predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients across seven emergency Departments in Colombia.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Using vocoders to the implanted ear to investigate the binaural benefit for music sound quality in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Comparison of Mineral Levels in Blood and Hair Samples of Healthy Adults: Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Hair Mineral Analysis.

Biological trace element research·2025
Same author

At-Home Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) Monitoring of Adult Females at Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Nonrandomized One-Year Longitudinal Feasibility Study.

JMIR formative research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve
10:53

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Published on: October 8, 2014

14.4K

Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation.

Monica Padilla1, David M Landsberger1

  • 1House Research Institute, 2100 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, California 90057 Monica.PadillaVelez@nyumc.org, David.Landsberger@nyumc.org.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|September 20, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Loudness summation in cochlear implants is similar for monopolar and tripolar stimulation. Differences in summation were larger for softer sounds and with greater channel separation, suggesting dependence on channel interaction.

More Related Videos

Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation of Human In Vitro Neural Cultures in Multi-Well Microelectrode Arrays
04:00

Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation of Human In Vitro Neural Cultures in Multi-Well Microelectrode Arrays

Published on: May 3, 2024

2.4K
A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve
10:53

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Published on: October 8, 2014

14.4K
Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation of Human In Vitro Neural Cultures in Multi-Well Microelectrode Arrays
04:00

Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation of Human In Vitro Neural Cultures in Multi-Well Microelectrode Arrays

Published on: May 3, 2024

2.4K
A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) use electrical stimulation to restore hearing.
  • Interleaved multi-channel stimulation in CIs can lead to loudness summation.
  • Loudness summation is the perception of increased loudness when multiple channels are stimulated compared to individual channels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare loudness summation between monopolar and tripolar stimulation modes in cochlear implants.
  • To investigate the influence of sound loudness and channel spacing on loudness summation.
  • To understand the role of channel interaction in loudness summation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants with cochlear implants were tested.
  • Loudness judgments were collected for interleaved multi-channel stimulation.
  • Monopolar and tripolar stimulation modes were used.
  • Two loudness levels and two channel spacing configurations were examined.

Main Results:

  • Loudness summation was found to be similar between monopolar and tripolar stimulation modes.
  • Greater differences in loudness summation were observed for softer sounds.
  • Larger spatial separation between channels also resulted in greater summation differences.
  • Results indicate loudness summation is influenced by the degree of channel interaction.

Conclusions:

  • Monopolar and tripolar stimulation exhibit comparable loudness summation effects.
  • Channel interaction significantly influences loudness summation, particularly at softer levels and wider separations.
  • Findings have implications for optimizing current-focused processing strategies in cochlear implants.