Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive errors: thinking clearly when it could be child maltreatment.

Antoinette L Laskey1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, 675 East 500 South, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, USA.

Pediatric Clinics of North America
|September 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Confessions in Cases of Child Physical Abuse-A CAPNET Study.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same author

Changes in child placement after child abuse pediatrics consultation for suspected physical abuse.

Child abuse & neglect·2025
Same author

Occult Abdominal Trauma Screening in the Evaluation of Suspected Child Physical Abuse.

Pediatrics open science·2025
Same author

Iatrogenic Flexion-Related Classic Metaphyseal Lesion of the Distal Tibia: Three Cases.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2023
Same author

Child physical abuse and COVID-19: Trends from nine pediatric trauma centers.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2021
Same author

Consultations in Child Abuse Pediatrics.

Clinical pediatrics·2020

Cognitive errors can impact child abuse diagnoses, leading to incorrect outcomes. This article examines these errors and suggests ways to improve diagnostic accuracy in child abuse cases.

Area of Science:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Cognitive errors are known to affect decision-making across various fields, including medicine.
  • Understanding cognitive processes is crucial for identifying situations prone to suboptimal outcomes.
  • Child abuse diagnosis is a complex process where cognitive errors can have significant consequences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how specific cognitive errors influence the diagnosis of child abuse.
  • To identify the potential for both false-negative and false-positive diagnoses due to cognitive biases.
  • To propose remedies for mitigating cognitive errors in child abuse evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of cognitive errors and their application in medical diagnosis.
Keywords:
AnchoringChild maltreatmentCognitive errorsConfirmation biasImplicit biases

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of diagnostic challenges in child abuse cases through the lens of cognitive psychology.
  • Synthesis of existing research to identify patterns of cognitive error in clinical practice.

    • Main Results:

    • Cognitive errors, such as confirmation bias and availability heuristic, can lead to misdiagnosis.
    • False-negative diagnoses may occur due to premature closure or anchoring.
    • False-positive diagnoses can result from overemphasis on suggestive but non-specific findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness of common cognitive errors is essential for clinicians diagnosing child abuse.
    • Implementing structured diagnostic approaches and seeking second opinions can reduce errors.
    • Further research is needed to develop and validate interventions aimed at minimizing cognitive bias in child abuse evaluations.