Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Facilitating text memory with additional processing opportunities in rapid sequential reading.

G P Sinclair1, A F Healy, L E Bourne

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variability in prescription opioid intake and reinforcement amongst 129 substrains.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2017
Same author

Searching for target letters in memory: Individual preferences and instructions for text representation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Stimulus selection and memory strategies in concept problems.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

The relative accessibility of semantic and deep-structure syntactic concepts.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cutoff location in recognition memory.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Providing extra processing time during rapid sequential visual presentation (RSVP) improves text memory. The timing and placement of these pauses are less critical than the total additional time offered for better reading comprehension.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Reading Science

Background:

  • Conventional reading involves pauses for text processing and integration.
  • Rapid Sequential Visual Presentation (RSVP) presents text rapidly, potentially limiting comprehension.
  • Strategic pauses in RSVP may enhance reading efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if providing processing time in RSVP facilitates text comprehension and memory.
  • To determine the impact of time parameters and pause distribution in RSVP displays.
  • To explore the structure of memory representations for text presented via RSVP.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments manipulating time parameters in RSVP displays.
  • Utilizing a sensitive fill-in-the-blank technique for text memory assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing RSVP presentation with traditional reading comprehension methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Memory for specific text significantly improved with additional processing time.
    • The distribution and location of additional time within the text were not critical factors.
    • The fill-in-the-blank method provided more sensitive data than multiple-choice questions.
    • Evidence suggests text memory is organized into meaningful subsentence units.

    Conclusions:

    • Additional processing time is key for enhancing text memory in RSVP.
    • RSVP comprehension is adaptable to various pause distributions, given sufficient time.
    • The fill-in-the-blank assessment reveals structured, unit-based text memory.
    • Findings have implications for designing effective digital reading interfaces.