Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
Published on: September 25, 2011
Test of four colon cancer risk-scores in formalin fixed paraffin embedded microarray gene expression data
Antonio F Di Narzo1, Sabine Tejpar1, Simona Rossi1
1SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland (AFDN, SR, VP, PW, EB, MD); Digestive Oncology Unit and Center for Human Genetics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (ST); Department of Pathology, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland (PY, FB); Oncology Research Unit, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA (TX, HE, AP, MM, EM, WS); Oncosurgery, Geneva University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland (AR); SAKK Coordination Center, Bern, Switzerland (AR); Ludwig Center for Cancer Research (MD) and Oncology Department, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (MD).
Four gene expression risk scores offer prognostic information for colon cancer patients but provide only marginal improvements over established factors. Combining scores may offer more robust predictions for overall and relapse-free survival.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Prognosis prediction for resected primary colon cancer relies on the TNM staging system.
- Investigated the utility of four gene expression risk scores for enhancing patient stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if gene expression risk scores improve patient stratification beyond the TNM system.
- To assess the prognostic value of risk scores for relapse-free survival (RFS), survival after relapse (SAR), and overall survival (OS).
Main Methods:
- Applied microarray-based risk scores to 688 stage II/III colon tumors from the PETACC-3 trial.
- Assessed prognostic value using regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
- Evaluated improvement over existing models including T-stage, N-stage, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status.
Main Results:
- All four risk scores (RSs) showed significant univariate association with OS or RFS.
- Individual RSs marginally improved RFS or OS models (AUC gains < 0.025).
- A combined score demonstrated higher prognostic value for OS (AUC increase from 0.6918 to 0.7321) and RFS (AUC increase from 0.6723 to 0.6945).
Conclusions:
- Tested gene expression-based risk scores offer prognostic information but have limited impact on established models.
- A combination of risk scores may provide more robust prognostic information.
- Distinct predictors for RFS and SAR may be necessary.
More Related Videos
10:33Molecular Profiling of the Invasive Tumor Microenvironment in a 3-Dimensional Model of Colorectal Cancer Cells and Ex vivo Fibroblasts
Published on: April 29, 2014
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...