Related Experiment Videos
The validity of self-reported information about hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a population-based survey: the
Marit Falkegård1, Henrik Schirmer, Maja-Lisa Løchen
1Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Objective:
To investigate the validity of self-reported information about hypertensive disorders in previous pregnancies among women participating in the fourth survey of the Tromsø Study.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study with case-control design.
Population:
Parous women participating in the fourth survey of the Tromsø Study.
Methods:
Medical records including partograms of 200 randomly selected women who had answered positively to whether they had hypertension and/or proteinuria during one or more of their previous pregnancies (cases) and 200 women who had answered negatively (controls) were studied. The cases and controls were matched for age. The investigators were blinded to the allocation of cases and controls until data collection was finished.
Main Outcome Measures:
Self-reported and actual prevalence of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and predictive value of self-reported hypertension and/or proteinuria in previous pregnancies.
Results:
Clinical data were missing for 23.5% (94/400) of the participants (50 cases and 44 controls). A total of 80% (120/150) of cases and 57.1% (89/156) of controls had answered the question on whether or not they had high blood pressure and/or proteinuria during their pregnancies correctly (positive predictive value 0.800; negative predictive value 0.571). The proportion of false-positive cases declined with increasing age while the proportion of false-negative controls increased until 55 years of age.
Conclusions:
We found good concordance between self-reported hypertension and/or proteinuria during previous pregnancies and actual clinical findings among the cases. However, there was a tendency towards under-reporting among controls.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)