Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Contribution of impaired renal function to cardiovascular risk prediction models in renal transplant recipients
Mowad Benguzzi1, Holly Mansell, Abubakar Hassan
1University of Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Insights
The Cardiovascular Risk Calculator for Renal Transplant Recipients (CRCRTR-MACE) identifies more high-risk patients than the Framingham Risk Score (FRS). This difference highlights the CRCRTR-MACE
Area of Science:
- Nephrology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Risk Stratification in Renal Transplant Recipients
Background:
- Cardiovascular risk is quantified in renal transplant recipients (RTR) using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and the Cardiovascular Risk Calculator for Renal Transplant Recipients (CRCRTR-MACE).
- The CRCRTR-MACE uniquely incorporates serum creatinine into its risk prediction, unlike the FRS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of varying renal function on the performance of the FRS and CRCRTR-MACE in RTR.
- To compare the ability of both risk calculators to identify patients at high cardiovascular risk.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective chart review of 270 RTR transplanted between 1979 and 2012.
- High cardiovascular risk was defined as a score of 20% or greater.
- Statistical analyses included multivariate analysis, stepwise analysis, and odds ratio calculations to assess risk factor contributions.
Main Results:
- The CRCRTR-MACE identified a higher proportion of high-risk patients (24.8%) compared to the FRS (9.3%).
- Even among RTR with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), CRCRTR-MACE identified more high-risk individuals (11.2% vs. 7.2%).
- FRS scores showed minimal variation across a wide range of eGFR, whereas CRCRTR-MACE scores significantly increased as eGFR decreased.
Conclusions:
- The CRCRTR-MACE demonstrates a superior ability to identify RTR at high cardiovascular risk, including those with better renal function.
- This suggests a significant difference in risk assessment between the CRCRTR-MACE and FRS, extending beyond the consideration of renal function alone.
Background:
The Framingham risk score (FRS) and cardiovascular risk calculator for renal transplant recipients (CRCRTR-MACE) quantify cardiovascular risk in renal transplant recipients (RTR). In contrast to the FRS, the CRCRTR-MACE includes serum creatinine as a variable in the risk prediction equation.
Objective:
To determine the influence of impaired renal function on performances of the two equations.
Methods:
A chart review of 270 RTR transplanted from 1979 to 2012. High risk was defined at scores ≥20%. Standard statistical analyses included multivariate analysis (MVA), stepwise analysis, and odds ratio to estimate contributions of risk factors.
Results:
Mean transplant duration was 9.51 ± 6.65 yr. Mean eGFR was 59.19 ± 28.26 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . FRS and CRCRTR-MACE scores of least 20% were present in 9.3% and 24.8%, respectively, while 7.2% and 11.2% of RTR with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were high risk, respectively. Mean age, blood pressure, TC:HDL ratio, smoking, and diabetes were evenly distributed in patients with varying eGFR. FRS scores remained similar at wide eGFR range (≤30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) -≥90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ), while CRCRTR-MACE scores significantly increased as eGFR decreased.
Conclusions:
CRCRTR-MACE identified more patients at high cardiovascular risk, even in those with more favorable renal function, suggesting a fundamental difference between the two calculators beyond renal function.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment
One condition associated with renal failure is uremia. Uremia is characterized by impaired glomerular filtration and fluid accumulation in the body. This condition hinders the renal clearance of drugs, resulting in drug accumulation and potential...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...

