Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding collision dynamics.

D L Gilden1, D R Proffitt

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22903-2477.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|May 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Streaks in skilled performance.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Perceiving geographical slant.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2002
Same author

Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical-slant perception.

Psychological science·2001
Same author

Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: geometry is more important than gravity.

Cognition·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

People judge object mass after collisions using simple rules, not precise calculations. They assume objects bouncing back or moving faster are lighter, relying on visual cues over actual physics.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Understanding how humans perceive physical properties like mass is crucial for fields ranging from robotics to human-computer interaction.
  • Previous research suggests intuitive physics understanding, but the specific heuristics used in collision events remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the heuristics people use to judge the relative mass of colliding objects.
  • To propose and test a heuristic model of judgment based on information salience.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving observation of object collisions.
  • Participants' judgments of relative mass were recorded and analyzed.
  • A heuristic model was developed and contrasted with direct kinematic data extraction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Judgments of relative mass were primarily based on two heuristics: objects that ricochet backward are perceived as less massive, and faster-moving objects are perceived as less massive.
  • Observer judgments relied on the relative salience of angle and velocity information, not solely on the distal mass ratio.
  • A heuristic model explaining judgment based on information salience was proposed.

Conclusions:

  • Human judgment of relative mass in collisions is heuristic-driven, prioritizing salient visual cues like trajectory and speed.
  • The findings challenge the notion that observers can always veridically extract dynamic properties from motion events.
  • The proposed heuristic model provides a framework for understanding how observers process and prioritize information in dynamic scenarios.