Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

47.8K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
47.8K
Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

4.0K
Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
4.0K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

4.7K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
4.7K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Echo01:06

Echo

1.2K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.2K
The Auditory Ossicles01:11

The Auditory Ossicles

3.8K
The auditory ossicles of the middle ear transmit sounds from the air as vibrations to the fluid-filled cochlea. The auditory ossicles consist of two malleus (hammer) bones, two incus (anvil) bones, and two stapes (stirrups), one on each side. These bones develop during the fetal stage and are the ones to ossify first. They are fully mature at birth and do not grow afterward.
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On-treatment change in bone turnover markers predicts 2-year bone mineral density after sequential therapy following romosozumab: a real-world cohort study.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026
Same author

Partial lumbar spine response in hip non-responders to romosozumab: Baseline bone mineral density as the principal determinant in a multi-center real-world Japanese cohort (n = 398).

Bone·2026
Same author

Context-Dependent Association Between Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Romosozumab Bone Mineral Density Response: A Stratified Analysis by Renal Function Category and Prior Treatment History in a Real-World Japanese Cohort.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Romosozumab Achieves Consistent Lumbar Spine BMD Gains Across All BMI Categories: The Apparent Enhanced Response in Underweight Patients is a Mathematical Artifact of Percentage Change.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same author

Prior treatment, not vitamin D, predicts romosozumab response in 314 osteoporosis patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Bone reports·2026
Same author

Sound production by hawkmoth larvae and pupae through abdominal spiracles.

The Journal of experimental biology·2025
Same journal

Crepuscular vocal partitioning and thermal limits on calling behavior in the Bubbling Kassina (Kassina senegalensis) in a sub-equatorial savanna.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Jewel beetles, Buprestidae, modulate bright structural colours by multileveled optical engineering and surface sculpting.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

E122Q rhodopsin: pigment microspectrophotometry, photoreceptor light responses, and bleaching adaptation.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Greater Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus nippon) gradually converge their echolocation call frequency to colony members.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Iridescence, polarisation and directionality of Morpho butterfly displays.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Simple Surgical Induction of Conductive Hearing Loss with Verification Using Otoscope Visualization and Behavioral Clap Startle Response in Rat
06:27

Simple Surgical Induction of Conductive Hearing Loss with Verification Using Otoscope Visualization and Behavioral Clap Startle Response in Rat

Published on: October 26, 2019

7.1K

Moth hearing and sound communication.

Ryo Nakano1, Takuma Takanashi, Annemarie Surlykke

  • 1Breeding and Pest Management Division, NARO Institute of Fruit Tree Science, 2-1 Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8605, Japan.

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|September 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Moths evolved ultrasonic hearing to detect bats, later developing sound production for defense and mating. This "whispered" communication, previously overlooked, occurs at close ranges.

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.0K
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Simple Surgical Induction of Conductive Hearing Loss with Verification Using Otoscope Visualization and Behavioral Clap Startle Response in Rat
06:27

Simple Surgical Induction of Conductive Hearing Loss with Verification Using Otoscope Visualization and Behavioral Clap Startle Response in Rat

Published on: October 26, 2019

7.1K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.0K
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Bioacoustics
  • Animal Communication
  • Sensory Ecology

Background:

  • Bats use echolocation for navigation and predation.
  • Nocturnal insects, particularly moths, have evolved ultrasonic hearing as a defense against bats.
  • Hearing in moths is primarily for bat detection, with sensitivity optimized within the 20-60 kHz echolocation range.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the evolution and function of sound production and communication in moths.
  • To explore the role of sensory exploitation in the development of acoustic communication.
  • To highlight the prevalence of ultrasonic communication in moths, including intraspecific signaling.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of hearing physiology and ear morphology in moths.
  • Investigation of sound production mechanisms and acoustic signals used by moths.
  • Behavioral observations and acoustic recordings of moth interactions.

Main Results:

  • Moths possess hearing sensitive to bat echolocation frequencies (20-60 kHz).
  • Some moths produce ultrasonic sounds for anti-bat defense and intraspecific communication.
  • Close-range, low-intensity ultrasonic "whispering" during courtship is common in many moth species.
  • Acoustic communication in moths, including mating signals, often occurs within the bat echolocation frequency range.

Conclusions:

  • Moth hearing evolved primarily for bat detection, with sound communication developing subsequently through sensory exploitation.
  • Contrary to previous assumptions, many eared moths engage in ultrasonic communication, particularly for mating.
  • The low intensity and high frequency of these signals explain why they were historically overlooked, indicating a human-centric bias in animal communication studies.