Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Characterize Disease-related Mutants of RAF Family Kinases by Using a Set of Practical and Feasible Methods
Published on: July 17, 2019
Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma
Georgina V Long1, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, Helen Gogas
1The authors' affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
Background:
Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition, as compared with BRAF inhibition alone, delays the emergence of resistance and reduces toxic effects in patients who have melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations.
Methods:
In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 423 previously untreated patients who had unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation to receive a combination of dabrafenib (150 mg orally twice daily) and trametinib (2 mg orally once daily) or dabrafenib and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, response rate, response duration, and safety. A preplanned interim overall survival analysis was conducted.
Results:
The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months in the dabrafenib-trametinib group and 8.8 months in the dabrafenib-only group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the dabrafenib-trametinib group, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.99; P=0.03). The overall response rate was 67% in the dabrafenib-trametinib group and 51% in the dabrafenib-only group (P=0.002). At 6 months, the interim overall survival rate was 93% with dabrafenib-trametinib and 85% with dabrafenib alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.94; P=0.02). However, a specified efficacy-stopping boundary (two-sided P=0.00028) was not crossed. Rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups, although more dose modifications occurred in the dabrafenib-trametinib group. The rate of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was lower in the dabrafenib-trametinib group than in the dabrafenib-only group (2% vs. 9%), whereas pyrexia occurred in more patients (51% vs. 28%) and was more often severe (grade 3, 6% vs. 2%) in the dabrafenib-trametinib group.
Conclusions:
A combination of dabrafenib and trametinib, as compared with dabrafenib alone, improved the rate of progression-free survival in previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT01584648.).
Insights
Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib improves progression-free survival in melanoma patients. This targeted therapy delays resistance and shows a higher response rate compared to BRAF inhibition alone.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations is a significant clinical challenge.
- BRAF inhibition alone can lead to resistance and toxic effects.
- Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is being investigated as a more effective treatment strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib alone in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma.
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint.
Main Methods:
- Phase 3 randomized trial involving 423 treatment-naive patients with unresectable stage IIIC or IV melanoma harboring BRAF V600E/K mutations.
- Patients received either dabrafenib plus trametinib or dabrafenib plus placebo.
- Key endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), response rate, and safety.
Main Results:
- Median PFS was 9.3 months with dabrafenib-trametinib vs. 8.8 months with dabrafenib alone (HR 0.75, P=0.03).
- Overall response rate was 67% vs. 51% (P=0.002).
- Interim OS at 6 months showed a higher survival rate (93% vs. 85%) with the combination, though not statistically significant at the pre-specified boundary.
Conclusions:
- Combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib significantly improved PFS in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma.
- The combination demonstrated a higher response rate and a trend towards improved overall survival.
- While adverse event rates were similar, the combination showed a lower incidence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma but increased pyrexia.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Inhibition of CDK Activity
MAPK Signaling Cascades
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle

