Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

622
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
622
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

10.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
10.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

12.0K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
12.0K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

8.5K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
8.5K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.6K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The course and trajectories of quality of life among post-COVID-19 patients in the HUS long covid cohort study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Somatic symptom burden and distress in post COVID-19 and persistent physical symptoms: Evidence from combined SSD-12 and PHQ-15 factor analysis.

Journal of psychosomatic research·2026
Same author

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Tear - 10-Year Outcomes.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Economic information in clinical decision-making: focus group discussions with Finnish general practitioners and patients.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Effect of smoking and smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications of orthopedic and hand surgery: A single-center interventional study.

Tobacco prevention & cessation·2026
Same author

Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10 year follow-up of the FIMPACT randomised, placebo surgery controlled trial.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

[Systematic reviews].

Antti Malmivaara, Jorma Komulainen

    Duodecim; Laaketieteellinen Aikakauskirja
    |October 2, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary

    This article provides guidance on finding, assessing, and using systematic reviews on effectiveness. These reviews are crucial knowledge sources for healthcare professionals, researchers, and decision-makers.

    Area of Science:

    • Health Sciences
    • Evidence-Based Practice

    Background:

    • Systematic reviews are essential for synthesizing research.
    • Effectiveness reviews inform critical decisions in healthcare and welfare.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide practical advice on identifying, evaluating, and utilizing systematic reviews on intervention effectiveness.
    • To highlight the value of systematic reviews for various professional groups.

    Main Methods:

    • The article outlines a systematic approach to literature searching for relevant reviews.
    • It details criteria for critically appraising the quality and applicability of systematic reviews.
    • Guidance is provided on effectively summarizing and applying review findings.

    Main Results:

    More Related Videos

    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
    04:34

    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

    Published on: February 17, 2023

    1.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
    08:36

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

    Published on: April 19, 2024

    1.4K
    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
    04:34

    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

    Published on: February 17, 2023

    1.9K
    • Systematic reviews offer a reliable foundation for evidence-based practice.
    • Effective utilization of these reviews enhances decision-making processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Professionals in healthcare, welfare, research, and development can leverage systematic reviews for informed actions.
    • Mastering the assessment and application of systematic reviews is key to advancing knowledge and practice.