Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

561
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
561
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

708
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
708
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

6.0K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
6.0K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

6.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
6.1K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.0K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Iron chaperones and RNA-binding proteins, PCBP1 and PCBP2, maintain hepatic iron balance and protect against ferroptosis.

Free radical biology & medicine·2026
Same author

The metabolic vulnerability index predicts outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Histologic severity is identical between normal weight and overweight adults with MASLD: Implications for the definition of lean MASLD.

Hepatology communications·2026
Same author

Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Comprehensive Lifestyle Intervention for Adolescents With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Prospective Controlled Cohort Study.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2026
Same author

GPR15-guided CD8<sup>+</sup> T regulatory cells control intestinal inflammation.

Nature·2026
Same author

Telomere biology disorders and hepatic disease.

Seminars in hematology·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Bayesian ROC curve estimation under verification bias.

Jiezhun Gu1, Subhashis Ghosal, David E Kleiner

  • 1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine
|October 2, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel Bayesian method to accurately estimate diagnostic test accuracy using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, even with missing gold standard test results due to verification bias. The new approach improves upon existing methods for medical diagnostic accuracy assessment.

Keywords:
MAR assumptionROC curvebinormal modelposterior consistencyverification bias-correction

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

860

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

860

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Diagnostic Test Accuracy
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are vital for assessing diagnostic test accuracy against a gold standard.
  • Gold standard tests are often impractical (invasive, costly, unavailable), leading to verification bias in subject selection.
  • Verification bias occurs when disease status verification is non-random, complicating accurate ROC analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new Bayesian approach for estimating ROC curves with continuous data.
  • To address the challenge of verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies.
  • To accurately estimate binormal model parameters and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) despite missing data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a semiparametric binormal model for continuous data.
  • Employed a rank-based likelihood and Gibbs sampling techniques.
  • Imputed missing disease status labels using Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) iterations to compute posterior distributions.

Main Results:

  • Successfully computed the posterior distribution of binormal parameters (intercept and slope).
  • Estimated the area under the curve (AUC) by imputing missing labels.
  • Established the consistency of the resulting posterior distribution under mild conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian method effectively handles verification bias in ROC analysis.
  • The new estimator demonstrates strong performance and accuracy compared to existing methods.
  • This approach offers a robust solution for estimating diagnostic accuracy when gold standard data is incomplete.