Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

9.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
9.1K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
9.1K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.7K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.6K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.6K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.5K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of psychosocial burden in parents of children with food allergy.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2026
Same author

A Single Dose Study of Pembrolizumab in People With HIV Infection Who are Immunologic Nonresponders.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Response-adaptive randomization with imperfect intermediate endpoints.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Event-driven planning of two-armed trials with a binary endpoint.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Exploratory analyses of predictors and correlates of response to omalizumab therapy in patients with multiple food allergies.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2025
Same author

Adopting the estimand framework in prophylactic vaccine trials.

Vaccine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K

Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.

Michael P Fay1, Michael A Proschan1, Erica Brittain1

  • 1National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 6700B Rockledge Dr. MSC 7630, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-7630, U.S.A.

Biometrics
|October 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a general method for creating reliable two-sample confidence intervals by combining one-sample procedures. This approach ensures accurate statistical inferences across various data types, including proportions, survival data, and medians.

Keywords:
Behrens-Fisher problemConfidence distributionsDifference in mediansExact confidence intervalFisher's exact testKaplan-Meier estimator

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical inference
  • Methodology in biostatistics
  • Data analysis techniques

Background:

  • Traditional two-sample inference methods often rely on specific distributional assumptions.
  • Existing confidence intervals may not always guarantee coverage or may require restrictive conditions.
  • There is a need for flexible and robust methods for two-sample statistical inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a general and simple method for constructing two-sample confidence intervals.
  • To demonstrate the application of this method to various statistical problems, including proportions, medians, and survival data.
  • To develop new confidence intervals with fewer assumptions and guaranteed coverage properties.

Main Methods:

  • Combining two independent one-sample confidence procedures to form a two-sample confidence interval.
  • Applying the method to exact binomial, Poisson, and t-test confidence procedures.
  • Developing a novel confidence interval for the difference between two survival distributions with independent censoring by combining beta product confidence procedures.
  • Theoretical analysis of asymptotic coverage properties.

Main Results:

  • The method reproduces established confidence intervals for proportions (matching Fisher's exact test) and ratios of Poisson rates.
  • New confidence intervals are derived for the difference in medians without requiring shift or continuity assumptions.
  • A new confidence interval for the difference in survival distributions at a fixed time point is introduced, guaranteeing coverage.
  • Theoretical results confirm asymptotically accurate coverage when combining asymptotically normal intervals.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed general method offers a unified approach to two-sample inference.
  • The method yields new confidence intervals with desirable properties, including guaranteed coverage and fewer assumptions.
  • This approach provides a flexible framework for developing robust statistical inferences in diverse applications.