Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Using indirect comparisons to compare interventions within a Cochrane review: a tool for comparative effectiveness
Maria Agapova1, Emily B Devine, Hiep Nguyen
1Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research & Policy Program, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195-7630, USA.
Aim:
Assessing relative performance among competing interventions is an important part of comparative effectiveness research. Bayesian indirect comparisons add information to existing Cochrane reviews, such as which intervention is likely to perform best. However, heterogeneity variance priors may influence results and, potentially, clinical guidance.
Methods:
We highlight the features of Bayesian indirect comparisons using a case study of a Cochrane review update in asthma care. The probability that one self-management educational intervention outperforms others is estimated. Simulation studies investigate the effect of heterogeneity variance prior distributions.
Results:
Results suggest a 55% probability that individual education is best, followed by combination (39%) and group (6%). The intervention with few trials was sensitive to prior distributions.
Conclusion:
Bayesian indirect comparisons updates of Cochrane reviews are valuable comparative effectiveness research tools.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Group Design
