Low-grade glioma management: a contemporary surgical approach

Marco Riva1, Lorenzo Bello

  • 1aUniversità degli Studi di Milano bDepartment of Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Aggressive surgical resection for low-grade gliomas is increasingly recommended. Maximal resection, aided by intraoperative mapping, improves survival and preserves function, despite limited randomized trials.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Oncology
  • Neurology

Background:

  • The optimal primary treatment for low-grade gliomas remains debated due to limited robust evidence.
  • Numerous studies over the past two decades have investigated surgical approaches.
  • A critical review is needed to clarify the role of maximal resection in low-grade glioma management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review existing investigations on low-grade glioma treatment.
  • To clarify the role of surgery aimed at maximal resection.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for low-grade glioma management.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of studies published in the last two decades.
  • Analysis of evidence supporting surgical resection strategies.
  • Evaluation of the impact of intraoperative stimulation mapping.

Main Results:

  • Despite a lack of randomized clinical trials, evidence supports an aggressive surgical strategy for low-grade gliomas.
  • Intraoperative stimulation mapping is crucial for maximal resection in eloquent brain areas.
  • Total resection is associated with improved outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical treatment is increasingly recognized as the initial choice for presumed low-grade gliomas.
  • Total resection improves seizure control, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
  • Maximal resection reduces malignant transformation risk and preserves functional status.

Related Concept Videos