Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed
Donna Patricia Manca1, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Kami Kandola
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton T6G 2T4, Alberta, Canada. dpmanca@ualberta.ca.
The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening (BETTER 2) program expands a successful primary care intervention across Canada. This initiative aims to improve patient health outcomes and healthcare system sustainability through enhanced chronic disease prevention and screening.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Primary Care
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening (BETTER) trial demonstrated the effectiveness of a prevention practitioner role in improving chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS).
- The BETTER 2 program builds upon the success of the original BETTER trial, aiming for broader implementation and evaluation.
- Key goals include enhancing clinical outcomes, reducing chronic disease burden, and improving healthcare system sustainability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the planned implementation and evaluation of the BETTER 2 program.
- To expand the BETTER intervention into diverse Canadian communities.
- To assess the effectiveness and sustainability of integrated CDPS in primary care.
Main Methods:
- The BETTER 2 program involves prevention practitioners delivering personalized, multi-condition, integrated, and longitudinal 'prevention prescriptions' to at-risk adults aged 40-65.
- Implementation spans multiple Canadian provinces and territories.
- Evaluation will utilize the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework with qualitative and quantitative methods, including a composite index to assess intervention effectiveness.
Main Results:
- The study is designed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the BETTER 2 program.
- A composite index will quantify the impact of the prevention practitioner intervention on CDPS actions.
- Data will be collected on process measures, referral/treatment, and outcomes related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and lifestyle factors.
Conclusions:
- BETTER 2 represents a collaborative, practice-based approach focused on integrating existing successful models.
- The program evaluation will identify factors influencing the implementation and sustainability of effective CDPS in primary care settings.
- Findings aim to inform adaptations for sustainable, non-research implementation of improved CDPS.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

