Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Prognostic role of restenosis in 10 004 patients undergoing routine control angiography after coronary stenting
Salvatore Cassese1, Robert A Byrne1, Stephanie Schulz1
1Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Lazarettstrasse, 36, Munich, Germany.
Insights
Restenosis detected by routine angiography after coronary stenting predicts 4-year mortality. This finding highlights the prognostic significance of restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Routine control angiography is sensitive for detecting restenosis post-coronary stenting.
- The prognostic implications of detected restenosis remain debated.
- Understanding restenosis impact on long-term mortality is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between restenosis and 4-year mortality.
- To assess the prognostic value of restenosis identified via routine control angiography.
- To evaluate the impact of restenosis on long-term survival after coronary stenting.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 10,004 patients undergoing coronary stenting and routine angiography (6-8 months post-procedure).
- Restenosis defined as diameter stenosis ≥50% at follow-up angiography.
- Cox proportional hazards models used to analyze 4-year mortality, adjusting for clinical factors.
Main Results:
- Restenosis was detected in 26.4% of patients (2643/10004).
- Restenosis was independently associated with increased 4-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.23; P=0.02).
- Age, diabetes, smoking, and reduced ejection fraction also independently predicted mortality.
Conclusions:
- Restenosis identified by routine follow-up angiography is a significant predictor of 4-year mortality after coronary stenting.
- The clinical utility and benefit of routine control angiography require further evaluation in randomized trials.
- These findings underscore the importance of monitoring for restenosis post-stenting.
Aim:
Routine control angiography is a valuable tool with high-sensitivity in detecting restenosis after coronary stenting. However, the prognostic role of restenosis is still controversial. We investigated the impact of restenosis on 4-year mortality in patients undergoing routine control angiography after coronary stenting.
Methods And Results:
All the patients undergoing successful implantation of coronary stents for de novo lesions from 1998 to 2009 and routine control angiography after 6-8 months at two centres in Munich, Germany were studied. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis ≥50% in the in-segment area at follow-up angiography. The primary outcome was 4-year mortality. The study included 10 004 patients with 15 004 treated lesions. Restenosis was detected in 2643 (26.4%) patients. Overall, there were 702 deaths during the follow-up. Of these, 218 deaths occurred among patients with restenosis and 484 deaths occurred among patients without restenosis [unadjusted hazard ratio: HR: 1.19; (95% confidence interval CI: 1.02-1.40); P = 0.03]. The Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for other variables identified restenosis as an independent correlate of 4-year mortality [HR: 1.23; (95% CI: 1.03-1.46); P = 0.02]. Other independent correlates of 4-year mortality were age [for each 10-year increase, HR: 2.34; (95% CI: 2.12-2.60); P < 0.001], diabetes mellitus [HR: 1.68; (95% CI: 1.41-1.99); P < 0.001], current smoking habit [HR: 1.39; (95% CI: 1.09-1.76); P = 0.01], and left ventricular ejection fraction [for each 5% decrease, HR: 1.39; (95% CI: 1.31-1.48); P < 0.001].
Conclusions:
In this large cohort of patients, the presence of restenosis at follow-up angiography after coronary stenting was predictive of 4-year mortality. Whether routine control angiography after coronary stenting is beneficial and influences outcomes should be evaluated by properly designed randomized trials.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management

