Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Neural decoding from surface high-density EMG signals: influence of anatomy and synchronization on the number of identified motor units.

Journal of neural engineering·2022

Same author

Mathematical relationships between spinal motoneuron properties.

eLife·2022

Same author

Standard intensities of transcranial alternating current stimulation over the motor cortex do not entrain corticospinal inputs to motor neurons.

The Journal of physiology·2022

Same author

Correlation networks of spinal motor neurons that innervate lower limb muscles during a multi-joint isometric task.

The Journal of physiology·2022

Same author

Reducing the Calibration Time in Somatosensory BCI by Using Tactile ERD.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2022

Same author

The control and training of single motor units in isometric tasks are constrained by a common input signal.

eLife·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction

Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction

Published on: September 28, 2019

Bionic limbs: clinical reality and academic promises.

Dario Farina¹, Oskar Aszmann²

¹Department of Neurorehabilitation Engineering, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany. dario.farina@bccn.uni-goettingen.de.

Science Translational Medicine

|October 10, 2014

Summary

Advanced neuroprosthetic systems deliver sensory feedback via nerve stimulation for prosthetic limb control. Future clinical systems may integrate osseointegration and implanted electrodes for wider patient access.

More Related Videos

The Bionic Clicker Mark I & II

The Bionic Clicker Mark I & II

Published on: August 14, 2017

Fabrication of the Composite Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface C-RPNI in the Adult Rat

Fabrication of the Composite Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface C-RPNI in the Adult Rat

Published on: February 25, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction

Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction

Published on: September 28, 2019

The Bionic Clicker Mark I & II

The Bionic Clicker Mark I & II

Published on: August 14, 2017

Fabrication of the Composite Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface C-RPNI in the Adult Rat

Fabrication of the Composite Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface C-RPNI in the Adult Rat

Published on: February 25, 2020

Area of Science:

Biomedical Engineering
Neuroscience
Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

Recent advancements in neuroprosthetics enable sensory feedback through direct nerve stimulation.
Current research focuses on integrating sensory information with prosthetic limb control, particularly for arm and hand movements.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss sensory-motor integration in neuroprosthetic systems.
To highlight the disparity between clinical and academic prosthetic technologies.
To explore future directions for clinical prosthetic systems.

Main Methods:

Review of recent neuroprosthetic systems presented in Science Translational Medicine.
Analysis of sensory feedback delivery via direct nerve stimulation.
Discussion of control mechanisms for prosthetic arm and hand movement.

Main Results:

Neuroprosthetic systems demonstrate the ability to deliver sensory information through nerve stimulation.
These systems facilitate control of prosthetic arm and hand actions.
A significant gap exists between current clinical prosthetics and advanced academic prototypes.

Conclusions:

Future clinical prosthetic systems may incorporate osseointegration, implanted muscles, and nerve electrodes.
These innovations promise to enhance prosthetic functionality and patient accessibility.
Advancements in sensory-motor integration are key to improving prosthetic reconstruction.