Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same author

Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.

Journal of vision·2026

Same author

Serial dependence in goal-directed interceptive hand movements.

BMC biology·2026

Same author

Scene variability affects action decisions, confidence and behaviour dynamics.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it?

Experimental brain research·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Dealing with delays does not transfer across sensorimotor tasks.

Cristina de la Malla¹, Joan López-Moliner¹, Eli Brenner²

¹Vision and Control of Action Group, Departament de Psicologia Bàsica, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (IR3C), Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.

Journal of Vision

|October 11, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People can learn to adapt to action-consequence delays by adjusting their predictions of sensory feedback. This learned motor control is specific to the task, not a general adaptation to delayed sensory consequences.

Keywords:

adaptation delays interception learning timing transfer

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Motor control
Human-computer interaction

Background:

Humans can adapt to temporal delays between actions and outcomes.
The mechanisms underlying this adaptation are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether adaptation to action-consequence delays involves adjusting sensory expectations or learning specific motor patterns.
To examine the specificity of this learned adaptation.

Main Methods:

Participants learned to intercept a moving target using a cursor with a time delay.
The transfer of this learned compensation was tested across modified and different timing tasks.

Main Results:

Participants successfully learned to compensate for the delay in the cursor task.
The learned compensation generalized across task modifications but not to unrelated timing tasks.

Conclusions:

Adaptation to action-consequence delays is task-specific.
Individuals learn to adjust their motor commands to account for delayed sensory feedback in specific contexts.