Endovascular versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renovascular disease
Mark Shipeng Yu1, David A Folt, Christopher A Drummond
1Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA, shipeng.yu@utoledo.edu.
Abstract:
The diagnosis of renal artery stenosis (RAS) has become increasingly common in part due to greater awareness of ischemic renal disease and increased use of diagnostic techniques. Over 90 % of RAS cases are caused by atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). Patients with ARVD are at high risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular and renal events. The mortality rate in patients with ARVD is high, especially with other cardiovascular or renal comorbidities. Recent clinical studies have provided substantial evidence concerning medical therapy and endovascular interventional therapeutic approaches for ARVD. Despite previous randomized clinical trials, the optimal therapy for ARVD remained uncertain until the results of the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) trial were released recently. CORAL demonstrated that optimal medical therapy was equally effective to endovascular therapy in the treatment of ARVD. Clinicians can now practice with more evidence-based medicine to treat ARVD and potentially decrease mortality in patients with ARVD using optimal medical therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System


