Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Do current clinical trials meet society's needs?: a critical review of recent evidence
Stuart J Pocock1, Bernard J Gersh2
1Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
This paper describes some important controversies regarding the current state of clinical trials research in cardiology. Topics covered include the inadequacy of trial research on medical devices, problems with industry-sponsored trials, the lack of head-to-head trials of new effective treatments, the need for wiser handling of drug safety issues, the credibility (or lack thereof) of trial reports in medical journals, problems with globalization of trials, the role of personalized (stratified) medicine in trials, the need for new trials of old drugs, the need for trials of treatment withdrawal, the importance of pragmatic trials of treatment strategies, and the limitations of observational comparative effectiveness studies. All issues are illustrated by recent topical trials in cardiology. Overall, we explore the extent to which clinical trials, as currently practiced, are successful in meeting society's expectations.
Insights
Current cardiology clinical trials face significant challenges, including issues with medical device research, industry funding, and treatment comparisons. Addressing these controversies is crucial for ensuring trials meet societal expectations and advance patient care effectively.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Research
- Cardiology
- Medical Research Ethics
Background:
- The current landscape of clinical trials research in cardiology is marked by several critical controversies.
- These issues impact the reliability, efficiency, and ethical considerations of cardiovascular research.
- Understanding these controversies is vital for improving the future of clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine and discuss key controversies in contemporary cardiology clinical trials.
- To evaluate the success of current clinical trial practices in meeting societal expectations.
- To identify areas for improvement in the design, execution, and reporting of cardiovascular trials.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of current controversies in cardiology clinical trials.
- Discussion of specific issues including medical device trials, industry sponsorship, and comparative effectiveness.
- Illustration of points with recent and relevant clinical trials in cardiology.
Main Results:
- Inadequacies in medical device trial research and issues with industry-sponsored trials are prevalent.
- A lack of head-to-head trials for effective treatments and concerns regarding drug safety handling are noted.
- Challenges exist in trial report credibility, globalization, personalized medicine integration, and the need for trials on old drugs and treatment withdrawal.
Conclusions:
- Current clinical trials in cardiology face numerous challenges that question their ability to meet societal expectations.
- Improvements are needed in trial design, funding transparency, comparative effectiveness research, and reporting standards.
- Re-evaluation of trial methodologies, including pragmatic trials and personalized medicine, is essential for advancing cardiovascular care.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Case Studies
01:30Current Trends in Nursing II
01:16Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
01:11Clinical Trials: Overview
01:28Preclinical Development: Overview
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...