Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Cross-linked survey analysis is an approach for separating cause and effect in survey research
Donald A Redelmeier1, Deva Thiruchelvam2, Andrew J Lustig3
1Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N3M5; Evaluative Clinical Science, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N3M5; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N3M5; Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, G-151, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N3M5; Center for Leading Injury Prevention Practice Education & Research, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N3M5.
Objectives:
We developed a new research approach, called cross-linked survey analysis, to explore how an acute exposure might lead to changes in survey responses. The goal was to identify associations between exposures and outcomes while reducing some ambiguities related to interpreting cause and effect in survey responses from a population-based community questionnaire.
Study Design And Setting:
Cross-linked survey analysis differs from a cross-sectional, longitudinal, and panel survey analysis by individualizing the timeline to the unique history of each respondent. Cross-linked survey analysis, unlike a repeated-measures self-matching design, does not track changes in a repeated survey question given to the same respondent at multiple time points.
Results:
Pilot data from three analyses (n = 1,177 respondents) illustrate how a cross-linked survey analysis can control for population shifts, temporal trends, and reverse causality. Accompanying graphs provide an intuitive display to readers, summarize results, and show differences in response distributions. Population-based individual-level linkages also reduce selection bias and increase statistical power compared with a single-center cross-sectional survey. Cross-linked survey analysis has limitations related to unmeasured confounding, pragmatics, survivor bias, statistical models, and the underlying artifacts in survey responses.
Conclusion:
We suggest that a cross-linked survey analysis may help in epidemiology science using survey data.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Surveys
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Cause and Effect
Longitudinal Research
Data Collection by Survey

