Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

228
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
228
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

1.1K
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
1.1K
Negative and Positive Feedback01:18

Negative and Positive Feedback

30.3K
30.3K
Self-Efficacy01:29

Self-Efficacy

364
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capacity to organize and execute actions necessary to manage prospective situations. This belief significantly influences how individuals approach goals, tasks, and challenges across different domains of life.Psychological and Educational ImpactsIndividuals with strong self-efficacy are more resilient in the face of difficulties. They are more likely to adopt effective problem-solving strategies, persist through obstacles, and regulate emotions such as...
364
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role Modeling in Medical Education: A Twenty-First Century Learner's Perspective.

Medical science educator·2024
Same author

How the Use of Kinesthetic Methods Impacted My Teaching.

Medical science educator·2024
Same author

Micromanagement in clinical supervision: a scoping review.

BMC medical education·2023
Same author

The Emerging Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education, Research, and Practice.

Cureus·2023
Same author

In Reply to Pylman and Greenberg.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2023
Same author

Finding the Place of ChatGPT in Medical Education.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

8.6K

Feedback providers' credibility impacts students' satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance.

J M Monica van de Ridder1, Francisca C J Berk2, Karel M Stokking3

  • 1a Albert Schweitzer Hospital , The Netherlands.

Medical Teacher
|October 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Feedback provider credibility significantly impacts medical student satisfaction and delayed skill performance. High credibility enhanced satisfaction and led to better long-term performance, suggesting its importance in medical education.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

8.6K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Research
  • Healthcare Professional Training
  • Learning and Development

Background:

  • Medical students receive feedback from diverse sources during clinical clerkships.
  • The impact of feedback on learning varies depending on the provider's credibility.
  • Understanding feedback provider credibility is crucial for optimizing medical education.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of feedback provider credibility on medical student satisfaction, self-efficacy, and skill performance.
  • To determine if credibility influences immediate and delayed learning outcomes.
  • To explore perceptions associated with high-credibility feedback providers.

Main Methods:

  • A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 68 first-year medical students.
  • Independent variable: feedback provider credibility (high vs. low).
  • Dependent variables: satisfaction, self-efficacy, and hearing examination skill performance, measured immediately and after a three-week delay.

Main Results:

  • High credibility significantly increased student satisfaction with feedback.
  • No significant effect of credibility on immediate or delayed self-efficacy.
  • Students showed significantly improved delayed performance after receiving feedback from a high-credibility source.
  • High credibility was linked to perceptions of negative feedback messages and unsocial providers.

Conclusions:

  • Feedback provider credibility is a key factor influencing satisfaction and long-term skill acquisition in medical students.
  • The perceived credibility of the feedback source can impact learning outcomes, even if the feedback content is perceived negatively.
  • Healthcare educators should consider their credibility when delivering feedback to enhance its effectiveness in clinical settings.