Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

154
Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
154
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

68
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
68
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

573
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
573
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

114
Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
114
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

622
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
622
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model01:15

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

88
The linear concentration–effect model, underpinned by the principle that pharmacological effect (E) is directly proportional to plasma drug concentration (C), emerges as a pivotal simplification of the Emax model for conditions where C is significantly less than EC50. This model portrays a linear trajectory of the concentration–effect relationship when drug levels are markedly below the EC50 threshold.Despite its inherent assumption of continuous effect augmentation with increasing...
88

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cross-sectional analysis of male versus female flourishing among 202,898 participants across 22 countries on 73 variables in the global flourishing study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Spirituality and Harmful or Hazardous Alcohol and Other Drug Use: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Love of neighbor assessment: validity, reliability, and a template for measurement.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Childhood experiences and adult self-rated physical health in 22 countries.

BMC global and public health·2026
Same author

Mental illness, mental health, and mental well-being.

Npj mental health research·2026
Same author

Adolescence in social context: Longitudinal associations of 15 social factors with health and well-being.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K

Controlled direct and mediated effects: definition, identification and bounds.

Tyler J VanderWeele1

  • 1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu.

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Theory and Applications
|October 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study provides new bounds for controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. The findings offer tighter estimations by assuming monotonicity with unmeasured confounders, potentially excluding the null hypothesis of no direct effect.

Keywords:
Boundscausal inferencedirect and indirect effectsmediationunmeasured confounding

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.2K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Statistical modeling
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Controlled direct effects are crucial for understanding causal pathways.
  • Existing methods for bounding these effects often rely on strong, untestable assumptions like monotonicity.
  • Unmeasured confounding remains a significant challenge in accurately estimating causal effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive new bounds for controlled direct effects when standard no-unmeasured-confounding assumptions are violated.
  • To introduce an alternative approach using monotonicity assumptions related to unmeasured confounders.
  • To define and discuss the identification of controlled mediated effects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed novel bounding techniques for controlled direct effects.
  • Assumed monotonicity relationships between unmeasured confounding variables and treatment, mediator, and outcome.
  • Extended the framework to include controlled mediated effects.

Main Results:

  • The proposed bounds are applicable even when no-unmeasured-confounding assumptions do not hold.
  • Unlike previous methods, these bounds may exclude the null hypothesis of no direct effect.
  • The derived bounds for controlled direct effects can also be applied to controlled mediated effects.

Conclusions:

  • This research offers a valuable advancement in causal inference under unmeasured confounding.
  • The new bounds provide more precise estimations and can lead to stronger conclusions about direct and mediated effects.
  • The methodology facilitates drawing inferences in complex scenarios with unmeasured confounding variables.