Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Management of critical lower limb ischemia in endovascular era: experience from 511 patients
Baker Ghoneim1, Hussein Elwan1, Waleed Eldaly1
1Vascular Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Insights
Endovascular treatment is a highly successful first choice for critical limb ischemia (CLI), achieving high limb salvage rates. Combining endovascular approaches with bypass surgery further improves revascularization outcomes in CLI patients.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Endovascular Interventions
Background:
- Critical limb ischemia (CLI) poses a significant challenge in vascular disease management.
- Atherosclerotic disease is a primary cause of CLI, often requiring revascularization.
- The optimal treatment strategy for CLI, balancing endovascular and surgical options, remains an area of active research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for CLI.
- To evaluate the role of bypass surgery in conjunction with or as an alternative to endovascular interventions for CLI.
- To determine revascularization and limb salvage rates in CLI patients treated with different modalities.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 511 patients with chronic atherosclerotic CLI over 3 years.
- Endovascular treatment was the primary approach; open surgery was reserved for failed endovascular cases or complex lesions.
- Patients were categorized by Rutherford classification and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II lesion severity.
Main Results:
- Endovascular treatment was utilized in 78.3% of patients, with a technical success rate of 94%.
- Overall revascularization success was 96.8%, with 24-month primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates of 77.8%, 84.7%, and 90.7% respectively for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
- Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3.7% of endovascular cases; 2% received hybrid treatment.
Conclusions:
- Endovascular revascularization demonstrates high technical success and limb salvage rates in CLI patients, supporting its role as a preferred treatment.
- A combined endovascular and surgical approach can achieve high revascularization rates (96.6%) in CLI.
- Treatment decisions should be individualized, considering both endovascular and surgical options to optimize patient outcomes.
Abstract:
This study aims at the assessment of the achievability of the endovascular treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and the role of bypass in such patient. This is a prospective study conducted on patients with chronic atherosclerotic critical lower limb ischemia presenting to us over a period of 3 years. Patients presenting with nonsalvageable limbs requiring primary major amputation and nonatherosclerotic causes of CLI were excluded. Endovascular treatment was the first choice modality of treatment in revascularization of all patients. Open surgery was offered selectively for patient whom endovascular failed or complicated and for long TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II lesions in fit patients. This study included 511 cases of CLI, and the mean age was 64.5 years. Patients with Rutherford IV, V, and VI were 19.25, 60.5, and 19.25%, respectively. The TASC II aortoiliac lesions were as follows: A, B, C, and D in 33.7, 12,15.7, and 38.6%, respectively, and infrainguinal lesions were A, B, C, and D in 3.7, 19, 35.4, and 68.3%, respectively. A total of 78.3% of patients were treated by endovascular totally, while 16% were treated by surgery from the start, 3.7% of endovascular cases were converted to open surgery after failure of endovascular treatment, and 2% was offered hybrid treatment. Crossing of lesions by subintimal and intraluminal was 12.5 and 87.5%, respectively. Technical success in endovascular was 94%; however, we could successfully revascularize 96.8% of all CLI presented in this study by either surgery or endovascular. On 24 months follow-up, primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty are 77.8, 84.7, and 90.7%, respectively. Revascularization by endovascular achieves high technical success and limb salvage in CLI, hence should be considered as preferred choice of treatment. However, both endovascular and surgery should not be counteracting each other and using both can revascularize 96.6% of CLI.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care