The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical

David A Richards1, Sarah Ross, Sarah Robens

  • 1University of Exeter Medical School, Haighton Building, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2 LU, UK. d.a.richards@exeter.ac.uk.

Trials
|October 17, 2014
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial (cmRCT) design is ethically acceptable and feasible for improving clinical trial recruitment. Addressing clinician-reported barriers is key to its successful implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Health Services Research
  • Mental Health Research

Background:

  • Poor participant recruitment hinders clinical trial progress.
  • The cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial (cmRCT) design offers a novel approach by pre-enrolling a cohort for multiple trials.
  • This design aims to streamline recruitment and address patient engagement in research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ethical acceptability and patient consent rates for the cmRCT design.
  • To assess clinician perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of the cmRCT approach.
  • To identify barriers and facilitators to implementing cmRCT in routine mental health services.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods study involving ethical review, patient consent tracking, and clinician interviews.
  • Participants were recruited from a community mental health service for anxiety and depression.
  • Thematic framework analysis was used for qualitative data from clinician interviews.

Main Results:

  • Favorable ethical opinion received from the UK Health Research Authority.
  • Clinicians approached 17% of potentially eligible patients; 53% consented to randomization in hypothetical future trials.
  • Clinicians cited patient wellbeing concerns, workload, and patient perceptions as recruitment barriers.

Conclusions:

  • The cmRCT design demonstrates ethical acceptability and patient willingness to participate, showing potential for improved clinical trial recruitment.
  • Implementation requires addressing clinician-identified challenges through targeted implementation science strategies.
  • Further efforts are needed to overcome practical barriers faced by clinicians in patient recruitment for trials.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
8.5K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
622
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
239