Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

46.3K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
46.3K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

6.3K
6.3K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

61.1K
Overview
61.1K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

57.7K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
57.7K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

214.7K
Overview
214.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide association studies of missing metabolite measures from two population-based studies.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Pathophysiology-based subtypes of individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes: multi-omics profiles and lifestyle differences across subtypes.

Metabolism: clinical and experimental·2026
Same author

How do PhD candidates perceive good research practices in the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity?

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same author

Dynamics of infection, vaccination and excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic among older individuals-a nationwide analysis.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Abdominal Fat Measures Are Associated With Sex-Specific Prothrombotic Changes in Middle-Aged Adults.

Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology·2026
Same author

Distinct plasma protein profiles after long-term remission of Cushing's disease.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast
07:18

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

10.0K

[Mendelian randomisation].

Hugoline G de Haan1, Bob Siegerink, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg

  • 1Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, afd. Klinische Epidemiologie, Leiden.

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|October 17, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Mendelian randomization analysis offers a robust solution to confounding factors in observational studies. This genetic approach clarifies causal links between risk factors and diseases, aiding treatment target identification.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Observational studies investigating risk factors and diseases can yield contradictory findings due to confounding variables.
  • It is challenging to determine if a risk factor is a viable treatment target based solely on classical observational studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Mendelian randomization analysis as a method to overcome limitations of observational studies.
  • To explain the principles and conditions for applying Mendelian randomization in causal inference.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing genetic variation as a surrogate for the risk factor.
  • Leveraging the principle of proportionate division of genetic variants among individuals.
  • Ensuring a robust genetic variant-risk factor relationship and absence of confounding pathways.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast
07:18

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

10.0K

Main Results:

  • Mendelian randomization can provide more reliable causal inference compared to traditional observational studies.
  • This method helps to distinguish true risk-disease relationships from spurious associations.

Conclusions:

  • Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for establishing causality between risk factors and diseases.
  • It enhances the identification of appropriate targets for therapeutic interventions by mitigating confounding bias.