Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

4.2K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
4.2K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

4.0K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast cancer screening policy-good science should trump bad politics.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same author

Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2019
Same author

Factors influencing survival among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2018
Same author

Cost-effectiveness analysis of whole-mount pathology processing for patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast conservation.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2016
Same author

Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2015
Same author

3D Pathology Volumetric Technique: A Method for Calculating Breast Tumour Volume from Whole-Mount Serial Section Images.

International journal of breast cancer·2013
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.6K

A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography.

A K Maki Bloomquist, J G Mainprize, G E Mawdsley

    Physics in Medicine and Biology
    |October 18, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A new observer model accurately predicts the detectability index (dʹ) for digital mammography quality control. This model shows promise as a system-independent metric across various mammography equipment.

    More Related Videos

    Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
    05:28

    Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

    Published on: November 14, 2025

    432
    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
    11:01

    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

    Published on: November 17, 2016

    48.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

    Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
    13:44

    Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

    Published on: August 30, 2013

    42.6K
    Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
    05:28

    Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

    Published on: November 14, 2025

    432
    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
    11:01

    Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

    Published on: November 17, 2016

    48.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging Physics
    • Radiological Sciences
    • Observer Performance Modeling

    Background:

    • Digital mammography requires robust quality control (QC) metrics.
    • Current QC methods may not adequately capture system performance across diverse platforms.
    • Task-based observer models offer a promising approach for evaluating image quality and detectability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To tune and validate an observer model for predicting the detectability index (dʹ) in digital mammography.
    • To assess the potential of the observer model's dʹ as a task-based QC metric.
    • To evaluate the model's performance across different digital mammography systems.

    Main Methods:

    • A reader study was performed to tune observer model parameters (noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function, contrast).
    • A non-prewhitening observer model, including an eye-filter and internal noise, was used to predict dʹ.
    • The model was validated using a test phantom with varying disc sizes imaged on six different digital mammography systems.

    Main Results:

    • A strong correlation (Pearson r=0.96) was observed between measured and modeled dʹ values.
    • The model demonstrated robustness with low coefficients of variation in dʹ (0.07–0.10) across systems.
    • Threshold thickness measurements showed minimal variation, with standard deviations ranging from 0.001 to 0.017 mm.

    Conclusions:

    • The observer model accurately predicts the detectability index (dʹ) for digital mammography.
    • The model's dʹ shows potential as a system-independent, cross-platform QC metric.
    • This approach offers a reliable method for task-based quality assessment in digital mammography.