Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Method to Study the Correlation Between Local Collagen Structure and Mechanical Properties of Atherosclerotic Plaque Fibrous Tissue
Published on: November 11, 2022
Biomarkers of plaque instability
1Division of Cardiology, Atherosclerosis Prevention and Treatment Center, Oppenheimer Atherosclerosis Research Center, Cedars Sinai Heart Institute, 127 South San Vicente Blvd: Suite A3307, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA, shahp@cshs.org.
Insights
Identifying vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques is key to predicting cardiovascular events. While inflammation markers show promise, their clinical predictive value for individuals remains limited, warranting further research for sensitive biomarkers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pathology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Atherosclerosis is the primary cause of arterial thrombosis and acute occlusive cardiovascular syndromes.
- Plaque rupture, often linked to inflammation and specific plaque features, leads to thrombosis.
- Vulnerable plaques share characteristics with ruptured plaques, indicating a risk for rupture.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the identification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques.
- To investigate the role of inflammation in plaque vulnerability and rupture.
- To assess the clinical predictive value of systemic inflammation markers for high-risk plaques and future athero-thrombotic events.
Main Methods:
- Review of pathological features associated with plaque rupture (inflammation, necrotic core, fibrous cap changes, neovascularity, microcalcification).
- Inference of vulnerable plaque characteristics based on features of ruptured plaques.
- Evaluation of systemic inflammation markers as potential biomarkers for plaque vulnerability.
Main Results:
- Plaque rupture is associated with inflammation, a large lipid-rich necrotic core, thin fibrous cap, outward remodeling, neovascularization, intraplaque hemorrhage, and microcalcification.
- Inflammation drives extracellular matrix dysregulation via metalloproteinases and smooth muscle cell death.
- Systemic inflammation markers have shown potential prognostic value, but their clinical predictive value is modest, especially for individuals.
Conclusions:
- Identifying vulnerable plaques could aid in predicting acute occlusive syndromes and guiding therapy.
- Inflammation plays a critical role in the development and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques.
- Further research is needed to develop reliable, cost-effective biomarkers with greater sensitivity and specificity for predicting high-risk plaques and cardiovascular events.
Abstract:
Atherosclerosis is the proximate cause of arterial thrombosis, leading to acute occlusive cardiovascular syndromes. Thrombosis in atherosclerosis usually results from rupture of the fibrous cap of atherosclerotic plaques with a smaller proportion resulting from superficial endothelial erosion. Ruptured plaques are often associated with intimal and adventitial inflammation, increased size of lipid-rich necrotic core with thinned out collagen-depleted fibrous cap, outward remodeling, increased plaque neovascularity, intraplaque hemorrhage, and microcalcification. By inference, non-ruptured plaques with similar compositional features are considered to be at risk for rupture and hence are labeled vulnerable plaques or high-risk plaques. Identification of vulnerable plaques may help in predicting the risk of acute occlusive syndromes and may also allow targeting for aggressive systemic and possibly local therapies. Plaque rupture is believed to result from extracellular matrix (which comprises the protective fibrous cap) dysregulation due to excessive proteolysis in the context of diminished matrix synthesis. Inflammation is believed to play a key role by providing matrix-degrading metalloproteinases and also by inducing death of matrix-synthesizing smooth muscle cells. Systemic markers of inflammation are thus the most logical forms of potential biomarkers which may predict the presence of vulnerable or high-risk plaques. Several studies have suggested the potential prognostic value of a variety of systemic markers, but regrettably, their overall clinical predictive value is modestly incremental at best, especially for individual subjects compared to groups of patients. Nevertheless, continued investigation of reliable, cost-effective biomarkers that predict the presence of a high-risk plaque and future athero-thrombotic cardiovascular events with greater sensitivity and specificity is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction

