Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

07:36
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
16.6K
On Being the Same in Different Places: Evaluating Frame-of-Reference Effects Across Two Social Contexts
John E Kurtz1, Amy Pastva Palfrey2
1Villanova University.
Journal of Personality
|October 21, 2014
Summary
Contextualizing personality assessments to specific social contexts did not improve their accuracy. Instead, matching specific personality traits with the right informant proved more effective for enhancing validity in personality research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Personality Assessment
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Frame-of-reference (FOR) effects suggest that self-rated personality items tailored to specific contexts (e.g., workplace) predict outcomes better than general items.
- Existing research primarily uses job performance or academic achievement as criteria to demonstrate FOR effects.
- The current study investigates FOR effects using personality ratings from home and school informants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate frame-of-reference (FOR) effects in personality assessment using home and school contexts.
- To determine if contextualized self-ratings (NEO-Home, NEO-School) enhance predictive validity compared to standard self-ratings (NEO-FFI).
- To examine the agreement between self-ratings and informant ratings (parents, peers) across different contextualizations.
Main Methods:
- Developed NEO-Home and NEO-School versions of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) by contextualizing items.
- Administered NEO-Home and NEO-School to 158 college students for self-ratings.
- Administered the standard NEO-FFI to 161 college students for self-ratings.
- Collected parent and peer ratings using the standard NEO-FFI for all participants.
Main Results:
- Contextualized self-ratings (NEO-Home, NEO-School) did not demonstrate frame-of-reference (FOR) effects.
- NEO-Home self-ratings did not show higher correlations with parent ratings than peer ratings, and vice-versa for NEO-School.
- Standard NEO-FFI self-ratings exhibited higher agreement with both parent and peer informants compared to contextualized self-ratings.
Conclusions:
- Contextualizing personality assessment items to social contexts (home, school) did not enhance validity in this study.
- The findings suggest that specific trait-informant combinations may be more crucial for enhancing personality assessment validity than contextualization alone.
- Future research should explore the interplay between specific personality traits, informant relationships, and contextual relevance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
506
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
506
Actor-Observer Effect
551
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in...
551
Social Proof
24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
Cognition and Behavior
482
Social psychology examines the complex interplay between individual mental processes and social interactions. Historically, the field was divided into two domains: social behavior and social cognition. Researchers focusing on social behavior analyzed actions within social contexts, such as conformity, aggression, or cooperation. Meanwhile, social cognition researchers investigated how people perceive, interpret, and mentally represent their social environments. However, modern perspectives no...
482
Framing Effects
7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
The Role of Culture
522
Culture plays a crucial role in shaping self-identity and influencing thought and behavior, a foundational interest within social psychology. The multicultural perspective recognizes that individuals do not exist in a vacuum; instead, their experiences, perceptions, and actions are deeply influenced by the intersecting dimensions of their cultural, ethnic, and social group affiliations.Cultural Influence on Self-Identity and Social PerceptionCultural frameworks inform how individuals define...
522

